-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: fix flaky test-http2-stream-destroy-event-order #31610
Closed
addaleax
wants to merge
1
commit into
nodejs:master
from
addaleax:fix-http2-stream-destroy-event-order
Closed
test: fix flaky test-http2-stream-destroy-event-order #31610
addaleax
wants to merge
1
commit into
nodejs:master
from
addaleax:fix-http2-stream-destroy-event-order
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Alternative to nodejs#31590. It appears that the issue here is that the test falsely assumed that closing the client (which also currently destroys the socket rather than gracefully shutting down the connection) would still leave enough time for the server side to receive the stream error. Address that by explicitly waiting for the server side to receive the stream error before closing the client and the connection with it. Refs: nodejs#31590 Refs: nodejs#20750
addaleax
added
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
flaky-test
Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI.
http2
Issues or PRs related to the http2 subsystem.
labels
Feb 1, 2020
2 tasks
richardlau
approved these changes
Feb 1, 2020
cjihrig
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2020
lundibundi
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Makes sense, good catch 👍
jasnell
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2020
lpinca
approved these changes
Feb 2, 2020
Trott
approved these changes
Feb 3, 2020
The alternative #31590 was closed in favor of this one. |
addaleax
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Feb 4, 2020
Landed in 06a43d4 |
Trott
pushed a commit
to Trott/io.js
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 6, 2020
Alternative to nodejs#31590. It appears that the issue here is that the test falsely assumed that closing the client (which also currently destroys the socket rather than gracefully shutting down the connection) would still leave enough time for the server side to receive the stream error. Address that by explicitly waiting for the server side to receive the stream error before closing the client and the connection with it. Refs: nodejs#31590 Refs: nodejs#20750 PR-URL: nodejs#31610 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2020
Alternative to #31590. It appears that the issue here is that the test falsely assumed that closing the client (which also currently destroys the socket rather than gracefully shutting down the connection) would still leave enough time for the server side to receive the stream error. Address that by explicitly waiting for the server side to receive the stream error before closing the client and the connection with it. Refs: #31590 Refs: #20750 PR-URL: #31610 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2020
Alternative to #31590. It appears that the issue here is that the test falsely assumed that closing the client (which also currently destroys the socket rather than gracefully shutting down the connection) would still leave enough time for the server side to receive the stream error. Address that by explicitly waiting for the server side to receive the stream error before closing the client and the connection with it. Refs: #31590 Refs: #20750 PR-URL: #31610 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2020
Alternative to #31590. It appears that the issue here is that the test falsely assumed that closing the client (which also currently destroys the socket rather than gracefully shutting down the connection) would still leave enough time for the server side to receive the stream error. Address that by explicitly waiting for the server side to receive the stream error before closing the client and the connection with it. Refs: #31590 Refs: #20750 PR-URL: #31610 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2020
Alternative to #31590. It appears that the issue here is that the test falsely assumed that closing the client (which also currently destroys the socket rather than gracefully shutting down the connection) would still leave enough time for the server side to receive the stream error. Address that by explicitly waiting for the server side to receive the stream error before closing the client and the connection with it. Refs: #31590 Refs: #20750 PR-URL: #31610 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Denys Otrishko <shishugi@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
flaky-test
Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI.
http2
Issues or PRs related to the http2 subsystem.
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Alternative to #31590.
It appears that the issue here is that the test falsely assumed that
closing the client (which also currently destroys the socket rather
than gracefully shutting down the connection) would still leave
enough time for the server side to receive the stream error.
Address that by explicitly waiting for the server side to receive the
stream error before closing the client and the connection with it.
Refs: #31590
Refs: #20750
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes