-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: fix flaky test-inspector-connect-main-thread #31637
Closed
addaleax
wants to merge
1
commit into
nodejs:master
from
addaleax:fix-flaky-test-inspector-connect-main-thread
Closed
test: fix flaky test-inspector-connect-main-thread #31637
addaleax
wants to merge
1
commit into
nodejs:master
from
addaleax:fix-flaky-test-inspector-connect-main-thread
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Previously, the test waited for a (any) message from the workers, and then attached another event listener to a specific kind of message. However, it was possible that the second listener was attached after the Worker had already exited, thus never receiving the message it was supposed to receive. (This is the race condition here – usually, the Worker thread would exit *after* the second listener was attached.) Solve this by keeping a single `'message'` event listener attached to the worker instance during its entire lifetime. Fixes: nodejs#31226
addaleax
added
the
flaky-test
Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI.
label
Feb 4, 2020
addaleax
added
inspector
Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol
worker
Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
and removed
test
Issues and PRs related to the tests.
labels
Feb 4, 2020
addaleax
added a commit
to addaleax/node
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 5, 2020
Motivated by the fact that getting this wrong has led to flaky tests in our test suite. Refs: nodejs#31637
3 tasks
eugeneo
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2020
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Trott
approved these changes
Feb 7, 2020
addaleax
added
the
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
label
Feb 7, 2020
Landed in 0279c2f |
Trott
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2020
Previously, the test waited for a (any) message from the workers, and then attached another event listener to a specific kind of message. However, it was possible that the second listener was attached after the Worker had already exited, thus never receiving the message it was supposed to receive. (This is the race condition here – usually, the Worker thread would exit *after* the second listener was attached.) Solve this by keeping a single `'message'` event listener attached to the worker instance during its entire lifetime. Fixes: #31226 PR-URL: #31637 Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2020
Previously, the test waited for a (any) message from the workers, and then attached another event listener to a specific kind of message. However, it was possible that the second listener was attached after the Worker had already exited, thus never receiving the message it was supposed to receive. (This is the race condition here – usually, the Worker thread would exit *after* the second listener was attached.) Solve this by keeping a single `'message'` event listener attached to the worker instance during its entire lifetime. Fixes: #31226 PR-URL: #31637 Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 15, 2020
Previously, the test waited for a (any) message from the workers, and then attached another event listener to a specific kind of message. However, it was possible that the second listener was attached after the Worker had already exited, thus never receiving the message it was supposed to receive. (This is the race condition here – usually, the Worker thread would exit *after* the second listener was attached.) Solve this by keeping a single `'message'` event listener attached to the worker instance during its entire lifetime. Fixes: #31226 PR-URL: #31637 Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 17, 2020
Previously, the test waited for a (any) message from the workers, and then attached another event listener to a specific kind of message. However, it was possible that the second listener was attached after the Worker had already exited, thus never receiving the message it was supposed to receive. (This is the race condition here – usually, the Worker thread would exit *after* the second listener was attached.) Solve this by keeping a single `'message'` event listener attached to the worker instance during its entire lifetime. Fixes: #31226 PR-URL: #31637 Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Merged
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 30, 2020
Previously, the test waited for a (any) message from the workers, and then attached another event listener to a specific kind of message. However, it was possible that the second listener was attached after the Worker had already exited, thus never receiving the message it was supposed to receive. (This is the race condition here – usually, the Worker thread would exit *after* the second listener was attached.) Solve this by keeping a single `'message'` event listener attached to the worker instance during its entire lifetime. Fixes: #31226 PR-URL: #31637 Reviewed-By: Eugene Ostroukhov <eostroukhov@google.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready
PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started.
flaky-test
Issues and PRs related to the tests with unstable failures on the CI.
inspector
Issues and PRs related to the V8 inspector protocol
review wanted
PRs that need reviews.
worker
Issues and PRs related to Worker support.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Previously, the test waited for a (any) message from the workers,
and then attached another event listener to a specific kind of
message. However, it was possible that the second listener was
attached after the Worker had already exited, thus never receiving
the message it was supposed to receive. (This is the race condition
here – usually, the Worker thread would exit after the second
listener was attached.)
Solve this by keeping a single
'message'
event listener attachedto the worker instance during its entire lifetime.
Fixes: #31226
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes