Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

test: use Promise.all() in test-hash-seed #32273

Closed
wants to merge 0 commits into from

Conversation

Trott
Copy link
Member

@Trott Trott commented Mar 14, 2020

We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to
finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways,
including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think
Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of
these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the test Issues and PRs related to the tests. label Mar 14, 2020
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Mar 15, 2020

@Trott Trott added the author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. label Mar 15, 2020
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Mar 17, 2020

Copy link
Contributor

@antsmartian antsmartian left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Trott added a commit to Trott/io.js that referenced this pull request Mar 18, 2020
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to
finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways,
including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think
Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of
these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea.

PR-URL: nodejs#32273
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
@Trott
Copy link
Member Author

Trott commented Mar 18, 2020

Landed in 1a3c747

@Trott Trott closed this Mar 18, 2020
@Trott Trott force-pushed the pummel-hash-seed branch from e8ba9f1 to 1a3c747 Compare March 18, 2020 01:30
@Trott Trott deleted the pummel-hash-seed branch March 18, 2020 01:30
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 19, 2020
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to
finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways,
including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think
Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of
these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea.

PR-URL: #32273
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
@MylesBorins MylesBorins mentioned this pull request Mar 19, 2020
MylesBorins pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 24, 2020
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to
finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways,
including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think
Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of
these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea.

PR-URL: #32273
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
targos pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 22, 2020
We have several tests where a number of asynchronous processes need to
finish before some checks happen. These are done in a number of ways,
including (as here) using our Countdown testing module. I think
Promise.all() may be the idiomatic and ergonomic way to go for a lot of
these tests. Using this one to get feedback on the idea.

PR-URL: #32273
Reviewed-By: Michaël Zasso <targos@protonmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Tobias Nießen <tniessen@tnie.de>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anto Aravinth <anto.aravinth.cse@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
author ready PRs that have at least one approval, no pending requests for changes, and a CI started. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants