test: fix fs test-fs-utimes strictEqual arg order #32420
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
`actual` is the first argument, `expected` the second, but the test flipped them around and was producing confusing assertion messages as a result. Refs: nodejs#32408 (comment)
richardlau
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2020
cjihrig
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2020
jasnell
approved these changes
Mar 22, 2020
gengjiawen
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2020
lpinca
approved these changes
Mar 23, 2020
addaleax
added
the
author ready
|
CI: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/30258/ (:heavy_check_mark:) |
addaleax
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2020
`actual` is the first argument, `expected` the second, but the test flipped them around and was producing confusing assertion messages as a result. Refs: #32408 (comment) PR-URL: #32420 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
|
Landed in e20b4f9 |
BethGriggs
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 7, 2020
`actual` is the first argument, `expected` the second, but the test flipped them around and was producing confusing assertion messages as a result. Refs: #32408 (comment) PR-URL: #32420 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 12, 2020
`actual` is the first argument, `expected` the second, but the test flipped them around and was producing confusing assertion messages as a result. Refs: #32408 (comment) PR-URL: #32420 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 22, 2020
`actual` is the first argument, `expected` the second, but the test flipped them around and was producing confusing assertion messages as a result. Refs: #32408 (comment) PR-URL: #32420 Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <riclau@uk.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
actualis the first argument,expectedthe second, but the testflipped them around and was producing confusing assertion messages
as a result.
Refs: #32408 (comment)