-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v14.x] Allow passing FileHandle objects via postMessage #33965
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
PR-URL: nodejs#33772 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Extend support for transferring objects à la `MessagePort` to other types of `BaseObject` subclasses, as well as implement cloning support for cases in which destructive transferring is not needed or optional. PR-URL: nodejs#33772 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#33772 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Enable JS wrapper objects to be used as transferable or cloneable objects in `postMessage()` calls, by having them extend a C++-backed class. This requires a few internal changes: - This commit adds the possibility for transferred objects to read/write JS values at the end of the serialization/deserialization phases. - This commit adds the possibility for transferred objects to list sub-transferables, e.g. typically the public JS wrapper class would list its C++ handle in there. - This commit adds usage of `BaseObject` in a few more places, because now during deserialization weakly held objects can also be involved, in addition to `MessagePort`s. PR-URL: nodejs#33772 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Allow passing `FileHandle` instances in the transfer list of a `.postMessage()` call. PR-URL: nodejs#33772 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
This is much nicer than just treating exceptions as uncaught, and enables reporting of exceptions from the internal C++ deserialization machinery. PR-URL: nodejs#33772 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
nodejs-github-bot
added
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
v14.x
labels
Jun 19, 2020
codebytere
approved these changes
Jun 22, 2020
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2020
Extend support for transferring objects à la `MessagePort` to other types of `BaseObject` subclasses, as well as implement cloning support for cases in which destructive transferring is not needed or optional. PR-URL: #33772 Backport-PR-URL: #33965 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 27, 2020
Enable JS wrapper objects to be used as transferable or cloneable objects in `postMessage()` calls, by having them extend a C++-backed class. This requires a few internal changes: - This commit adds the possibility for transferred objects to read/write JS values at the end of the serialization/deserialization phases. - This commit adds the possibility for transferred objects to list sub-transferables, e.g. typically the public JS wrapper class would list its C++ handle in there. - This commit adds usage of `BaseObject` in a few more places, because now during deserialization weakly held objects can also be involved, in addition to `MessagePort`s. PR-URL: #33772 Backport-PR-URL: #33965 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Landed in 6dbd63c...4a37180 |
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2020
Extend support for transferring objects à la `MessagePort` to other types of `BaseObject` subclasses, as well as implement cloning support for cases in which destructive transferring is not needed or optional. PR-URL: #33772 Backport-PR-URL: #33965 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
codebytere
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 30, 2020
Enable JS wrapper objects to be used as transferable or cloneable objects in `postMessage()` calls, by having them extend a C++-backed class. This requires a few internal changes: - This commit adds the possibility for transferred objects to read/write JS values at the end of the serialization/deserialization phases. - This commit adds the possibility for transferred objects to list sub-transferables, e.g. typically the public JS wrapper class would list its C++ handle in there. - This commit adds usage of `BaseObject` in a few more places, because now during deserialization weakly held objects can also be involved, in addition to `MessagePort`s. PR-URL: #33772 Backport-PR-URL: #33965 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2020
Extend support for transferring objects à la `MessagePort` to other types of `BaseObject` subclasses, as well as implement cloning support for cases in which destructive transferring is not needed or optional. PR-URL: #33772 Backport-PR-URL: #33965 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
addaleax
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Sep 27, 2020
Enable JS wrapper objects to be used as transferable or cloneable objects in `postMessage()` calls, by having them extend a C++-backed class. This requires a few internal changes: - This commit adds the possibility for transferred objects to read/write JS values at the end of the serialization/deserialization phases. - This commit adds the possibility for transferred objects to list sub-transferables, e.g. typically the public JS wrapper class would list its C++ handle in there. - This commit adds usage of `BaseObject` in a few more places, because now during deserialization weakly held objects can also be involved, in addition to `MessagePort`s. PR-URL: #33772 Backport-PR-URL: #33965 Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport of #33772 (only one minor conflict, between the first commit and #33600)