-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
crypto: avoid unitializing ECDH objects on error #34302
crypto: avoid unitializing ECDH objects on error #34302
Conversation
I’m guessing this test failure is not unrelated? https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-commit-linux-containered/21411/nodes=ubi81_sharedlibs_openssl111fips_x64/testReport/junit/(root)/test/parallel_test_crypto_dh/
|
I ran the test about 100,000 times locally without errors, so the error seems to be platform-specific. CI stress test: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/167/
Crash
Failed to convert Buffer to EC_POINT
ERR_CRYPTO_ECDH_INVALID_PUBLIC_KEY
New stress test with a few more platforms: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-stress-single-test/168/
Seems like a memory-related bug. Can reproduce in valgrind on Ubuntu. |
The previous code changed the private key of the ECDH object, but removed the public key if deriving it from the private key failed. Instead, if deriving the public key fails, neither the private nor the public key stored in the ECDH object should be updated.
46040f1
to
a8c7d72
Compare
Landed in 4a9e312, thanks for reviewing. |
The previous code changed the private key of the ECDH object, but removed the public key if deriving it from the private key failed. Instead, if deriving the public key fails, neither the private nor the public key stored in the ECDH object should be updated. PR-URL: #34302 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
The previous code changed the private key of the ECDH object, but removed the public key if deriving it from the private key failed. Instead, if deriving the public key fails, neither the private nor the public key stored in the ECDH object should be updated. PR-URL: #34302 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
The previous code changed the private key of the ECDH object, but removed the public key if deriving it from the private key failed. Instead, if deriving the public key fails, neither the private nor the public key stored in the ECDH object should be updated. PR-URL: #34302 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
The previous code changed the private key of the ECDH object, but removed the public key if deriving it from the private key failed. Instead, if deriving the public key fails, neither the private nor the public key stored in the ECDH object should be updated. PR-URL: #34302 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
The previous code changed the private key of the ECDH object, but removed the public key if deriving it from the private key failed. Instead, if deriving the public key fails, neither the private nor the public key stored in the ECDH object should be updated. PR-URL: #34302 Reviewed-By: Ben Noordhuis <info@bnoordhuis.nl> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
The previous code changed the private key of the ECDH object, but removed the public key if deriving it from the private key failed. Instead, if deriving the public key fails, neither the private nor the public key stored in the ECDH object should be updated.
Checklist
make -j4 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test
(Windows) passes