-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
repl: unflag Top-Level Await #34733
Closed
Closed
repl: unflag Top-Level Await #34733
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
10 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a9d6eb4
repl: unflag top-level await
hemanth 75d5b8e
repl: adding --no-experimental-repl-await flag.
hemanth 4c89088
Update doc/api/cli.md
hemanth 1aafad6
Update doc/api/cli.md
hemanth e5c977f
Update src/node_options.cc
hemanth fda3e7b
Update test/parallel/test-process-env-allowed-flags-are-documented.js
hemanth b9fced9
Update src/node_options.cc
hemanth b32662d
fixup: lint fix, link order.
hemanth a11339b
fixup: using the placeholder REPLACEME
hemanth a9f1e00
fixup: alphabetic order of flags.
hemanth File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We have now a mechanism to flip the default value of a flag (making it possible to opt out with
--no-experimental-repl-await
.Are we confident enough about the feature to remove the flag?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That does sound like a good way to ensure an opt-out in case there are issues.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
So, do we introduce
--no-experimental-repl-await
flag and check if it not set here or we use theImpliesNot("--no-harmony-top-level-await", "--experimental-top-level-await");
? Either way we would need togetOptionValue
and check if it is not set in this condition, right?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hemanth I believe just the
ImpliesNot
line is enough here, and then changing the default value for--experimental-repl-await
to being enabled. That should fully cover the feature per my reading of #39023.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Cool, so
experimental-repl-await
shall be undocumented and enabled,--no-experimental-repl-await
shall be documented.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks for making the change! I added a few suggestions