Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

src: rename AliasedBufferInfo->AliasedBufferIndex #36339

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

danbev
Copy link
Contributor

@danbev danbev commented Dec 1, 2020

This commit suggest renaming AlaisedBufferInfo to AlaisedBufferIndex to
make the code more readable.

The main motivation for this change is that I personally think that
the following code could be a little clearer:

  context->GetDataFromSnapshotOnce<V8T>(*info_).ToLocalChecked();

Even knowing that GetDataFromSnapshotOnce takes a size_t I had to double
check the type of info_ to make sure.

Checklist
  • make -j4 test (UNIX), or vcbuild test (Windows) passes
  • commit message follows commit guidelines

This commit suggest renaming AlaisedBufferInfo to AlaisedBufferIndex to
make the code more readable.

The main motivation for this change is that I personally think that
the following code could be a little clearer:

  context->GetDataFromSnapshotOnce<V8T>(*info_).ToLocalChecked();

Even knowing that GetDataFromSnapshotOnce takes a size_t I had to double
check the type of info_ to make sure.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added the c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++. label Dec 1, 2020
@Trott Trott added the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 3, 2020
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the request-ci Add this label to start a Jenkins CI on a PR. label Dec 3, 2020
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@danbev
Copy link
Contributor Author

danbev commented Dec 4, 2020

Landed in e4614e8.

@danbev danbev closed this Dec 4, 2020
danbev added a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 4, 2020
This commit suggest renaming AlaisedBufferInfo to AlaisedBufferIndex to
make the code more readable.

The main motivation for this change is that I personally think that
the following code could be a little clearer:

  context->GetDataFromSnapshotOnce<V8T>(*info_).ToLocalChecked();

Even knowing that GetDataFromSnapshotOnce takes a size_t I had to double
check the type of info_ to make sure.

PR-URL: #36339
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@danbev danbev deleted the aliasedbuffer-index branch December 4, 2020 07:44
danielleadams pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Dec 7, 2020
This commit suggest renaming AlaisedBufferInfo to AlaisedBufferIndex to
make the code more readable.

The main motivation for this change is that I personally think that
the following code could be a little clearer:

  context->GetDataFromSnapshotOnce<V8T>(*info_).ToLocalChecked();

Even knowing that GetDataFromSnapshotOnce takes a size_t I had to double
check the type of info_ to make sure.

PR-URL: #36339
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
@danielleadams danielleadams mentioned this pull request Dec 7, 2020
cjihrig pushed a commit to cjihrig/node that referenced this pull request Dec 8, 2020
This commit suggest renaming AlaisedBufferInfo to AlaisedBufferIndex to
make the code more readable.

The main motivation for this change is that I personally think that
the following code could be a little clearer:

  context->GetDataFromSnapshotOnce<V8T>(*info_).ToLocalChecked();

Even knowing that GetDataFromSnapshotOnce takes a size_t I had to double
check the type of info_ to make sure.

PR-URL: nodejs#36339
Reviewed-By: Zeyu Yang <himself65@outlook.com>
Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
c++ Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants