-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: child_process: clarify subprocess.pid
can be undefined
when ENOENT
#37014
Conversation
Do you want to update the test to make sure there's no regression in the future? node/test/parallel/test-child-process-spawn-error.js Lines 29 to 42 in 3df5afb
|
Sure, I'll try update the test. |
@aduh95 Upon adding the test, I found the
Should I add more detailed behavior description to the doc and update test for async and sync spawn, The test code for this: [test.js][
() => testSpawn('with invalid command', [ 'non-exist-command' ]),
() => testSpawn('with invalid command and `shell: true`', [ 'non-exist-command', { shell: true } ]),
() => testSpawn('with invalid cwd', [ 'node', { cwd: './non/exist/cwd/path/' } ]),
() => testSpawn('invalid cwd and `shell: true`', [ 'node', { cwd: './non/exist/cwd/path/', shell: true } ]),
() => testSpawnSync('with invalid command', [ 'non-exist-command' ]),
() => testSpawnSync('with invalid command and `shell: true`', [ 'non-exist-command', { shell: true } ]),
() => testSpawnSync('with invalid cwd', [ 'node', { cwd: './non/exist/cwd/path/' } ]),
() => testSpawnSync('invalid cwd and `shell: true`', [ 'node', { cwd: './non/exist/cwd/path/', shell: true } ])
].forEach((testFunc, index) => setTimeout(testFunc, index * 200))
const formatError = (error) => error && error.message
// const formatError = (error) => error && error.stack // for more detail
const testSpawn = (title = '', spawnArgs = '') => {
console.log(`\n== test spawn ${title} ==`)
const { spawn } = require('child_process')
const subProcess = spawn(...spawnArgs)
subProcess.on('error', (error) => console.warn('- "error" event:', formatError(error))) // mute Unhandled "error" event or the test will exit
console.log('- pid:', subProcess.pid, 'exitCode:', subProcess.exitCode)
process.nextTick(() => console.log('- nextTick pid:', subProcess.pid, 'exitCode:', subProcess.exitCode))
setTimeout(() => console.log('- after 100ms pid:', subProcess.pid, 'exitCode:', subProcess.exitCode), 100)
}
const testSpawnSync = (title = '', spawnArgs = '') => {
console.log(`\n== test spawnSync ${title} ==`)
const { spawnSync } = require('child_process')
const outcome = spawnSync(...spawnArgs) // NOTE: not a `subProcess`
console.log('- pid:', outcome.pid, 'status', outcome.status)
console.log('- error', formatError(outcome.error))
} And the output: [v15.6.0 linux x64]
[v15.6.0 win32 x64]
|
Hum that's weird indeed, that might be a bug with |
@aduh95 Sure, so in this PR I'll add docs & test checks for And I'll open another Issue with above test to discuss sync spawn pid behavior, and maybe a PR to add test to |
9933250
to
fd5748b
Compare
LGTM with doc updates. @nodejs/documentation @nodejs/child_process |
ec48ec2
to
61f86f3
Compare
From the code `nodejs@8` and up should behave the same: github.com/nodejs/node/blame/v8.17.0/lib/internal/child_process.js#L290 And a short test snippet: ```js const { spawn } = require('child_process') const subProcess = spawn('non-exist-command') subProcess.on('error', (error) => console.warn('mute Unhandled "error" event:', error)) console.log('- pid:', subProcess.pid) process.nextTick(() => console.log('- after error emit')) console.log('== end of test ==') ``` Note: the sync spawn result `pid` currently do not follow this pattern. Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> PR-URL: nodejs#37014 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Note: this only add checks for async spawn, as the sync spawn do not return a `subProcess`. PR-URL: nodejs#37014 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
61f86f3
to
1e0cfa3
Compare
Landed in 574590d...1e0cfa3 |
From the code `nodejs@8` and up should behave the same: github.com/nodejs/node/blame/v8.17.0/lib/internal/child_process.js#L290 And a short test snippet: ```js const { spawn } = require('child_process') const subProcess = spawn('non-exist-command') subProcess.on('error', (error) => console.warn('mute Unhandled "error" event:', error)) console.log('- pid:', subProcess.pid) process.nextTick(() => console.log('- after error emit')) console.log('== end of test ==') ``` Note: the sync spawn result `pid` currently do not follow this pattern. Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> PR-URL: #37014 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Note: this only add checks for async spawn, as the sync spawn do not return a `subProcess`. PR-URL: #37014 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
From the code `nodejs@8` and up should behave the same: github.com/nodejs/node/blame/v8.17.0/lib/internal/child_process.js#L290 And a short test snippet: ```js const { spawn } = require('child_process') const subProcess = spawn('non-exist-command') subProcess.on('error', (error) => console.warn('mute Unhandled "error" event:', error)) console.log('- pid:', subProcess.pid) process.nextTick(() => console.log('- after error emit')) console.log('== end of test ==') ``` Note: the sync spawn result `pid` currently do not follow this pattern. Co-authored-by: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> PR-URL: #37014 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
Note: this only add checks for async spawn, as the sync spawn do not return a `subProcess`. PR-URL: #37014 Reviewed-By: Antoine du Hamel <duhamelantoine1995@gmail.com>
From the code
nodejs@8
and up should behave the same: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blame/v8.17.0/lib/internal/child_process.js#L290-L316And a short test snippet: