-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Policy scope fix #37298
Policy scope fix #37298
Conversation
718f600
to
d74f91e
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
CI failure seems to be flaking and not related to this PR. Will merge in a few unless otherwise commented |
ah, nm needs 1 more collab approval, missed that (will go poking around for one) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Couple of minor nits but LGTM
Co-authored-by: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
CI issues seem unrelated, going to merge in a bit |
PR-URL: #37298 Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
Landed in f24e707 |
PR-URL: #37298 Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: #37298 Reviewed-By: Vladimir de Turckheim <vlad2t@hotmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Co-authored-by: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
This fixes a case where repeated scope lookup for modules with multiple dependencies would fail and the manifest would look up the dependency redirector of the referrer rather than the scope. This was found in stress testing of https://github.com/bmeck/local-fs-https-imports . The reason it didn't appear to have a test before is likely that code coverage was unaffected.