-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30.5k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify #37500
Closed
Closed
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
11 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
3cf3b94
crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva 26c3c3d
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva 0788fca
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva c5f956f
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva 66b1802
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva 53169cc
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva b4f69b8
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva 0c9f8cf
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva f26d4b0
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva 670960f
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva 78440b9
fixup! crypto: add optional callback to crypto.sign and crypto.verify
panva File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Can't this block be replaced with a call to
preparePrivateKey
? Maybe I'm missing something.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It cannot, SignJob expects a KeyObjectHandle and in case the key input is not already an existing key object abstraction (the first two if blocks) then
preparePrivateKey
(orpreparePublicOrPrivateKey
) returns the raw data instead of a handle.