-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.9k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
src: avoid deferred gc/cleanup for Buffer.from #38337
src: avoid deferred gc/cleanup for Buffer.from #38337
Conversation
Previously, the code path would allocated a tracked ArrayBuffer that defers cleanup and deallocation of the underlying data with a SetImmediate. Avoid the unnecessary deferral by just allocating a `BackingStore` directly and writing into it. Fixes: nodejs#38300 Refs: nodejs#38336
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
Co-authored-by: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
After testing:
const str = 'x'.repeat(10000);
console.log('start', process.memoryUsage());
console.time('1');
for(let i = 0; i < 1e6; i++) {
Buffer.from(str); // memory leak happens here
if (i % 1e5 === 0) {
// await wait(100);
gc();
console.log('step', i, 'rss', process.memoryUsage().rss);
}
}
console.timeEnd('1');
gc();
console.log('end', process.memoryUsage());
The new PR #38337 runs about 3.9s in my computer. And 39f42d1a2d (before using BackingStore
) runs about 3.7s. I think this performance loss is acceptable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
This comment has been minimized.
@nodejs/build ... is there a known issue with the node-test-commit-arm-fanned cluster? It is failing consistently on multiple PRs |
I cleaned up leftover node process on three of the pi 2's this morning. AFAIK things should be okay now. |
@richardlau ... no joy it seems. See https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-binary-arm-12+/10459/RUN_SUBSET=1,label=pi2-docker/console for #38331, for instance. |
Previously, the code path would allocated a tracked ArrayBuffer that defers cleanup and deallocation of the underlying data with a SetImmediate. Avoid the unnecessary deferral by just allocating a `BackingStore` directly and writing into it. Fixes: #38300 Refs: #38336 PR-URL: #38337 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Landed in 720fdf2 |
Previously, the code path would allocated a tracked ArrayBuffer that defers cleanup and deallocation of the underlying data with a SetImmediate. Avoid the unnecessary deferral by just allocating a `BackingStore` directly and writing into it. Fixes: #38300 Refs: #38336 PR-URL: #38337 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Previously, the code path would allocated a tracked ArrayBuffer that defers cleanup and deallocation of the underlying data with a SetImmediate. Avoid the unnecessary deferral by just allocating a `BackingStore` directly and writing into it. Fixes: #38300 Refs: #38336 PR-URL: #38337 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Previously, the code path would allocated a tracked ArrayBuffer that defers cleanup and deallocation of the underlying data with a SetImmediate. Avoid the unnecessary deferral by just allocating a `BackingStore` directly and writing into it. Fixes: #38300 Refs: #38336 PR-URL: #38337 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
Previously, the code path would allocated a tracked ArrayBuffer that defers cleanup and deallocation of the underlying data with a SetImmediate. Avoid the unnecessary deferral by just allocating a `BackingStore` directly and writing into it. Fixes: #38300 Refs: #38336 PR-URL: #38337 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com>
/cc @addaleax @Daninet
Previously, the code path would allocated a tracked
ArrayBuffer
that defers cleanup and deallocation of the underlying data with a nativeSetImmediate
. Avoid the unnecessary deferral by just allocating aBackingStore
directly and writing into it.This should be considered an alternative to #38336
Fixes: #38300
Refs: #38336