-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools: disable LTO for "v8_cppgc_shared" target #38346
Conversation
"PushAllRegistersAndIterateStack" is implemented in assembly and called from "stack.cc" via 'extern "C"'. [1] However, LTO does not work well with symbol usage from assembly. [2] This change workarounds the issue by disabling LTO for the target. With GCC 10 and "./configure --enable-lto", compilation succeeds after this change. [1] v8/v8@c10863153 [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimizationFAQ#Symbol_usage_from_assembly_language Refs: #35957 Refs: #38335 Signed-off-by: Jesse Chan <jc@linux.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
lgtm if CI is OK
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, although the conditional is probably redundant.
@@ -1378,6 +1378,9 @@ | |||
'<(V8_ROOT)/src/heap/base/worklist.h', | |||
], | |||
'conditions': [ | |||
['enable_lto=="true"', { | |||
'cflags_cc': [ '-fno-lto' ], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This could be set regardless of the enable_lto
setting?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Technically, yes, at least for GCC. But I am not sure about MSVC or Clang. Since enable_lto
implies some other conditions, I think it is better to have this conditional.
Landed in 6ca785b |
"PushAllRegistersAndIterateStack" is implemented in assembly and called from "stack.cc" via 'extern "C"'. [1] However, LTO does not work well with symbol usage from assembly. [2] This change workarounds the issue by disabling LTO for the target. With GCC 10 and "./configure --enable-lto", compilation succeeds after this change. [1] v8/v8@c10863153 [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimizationFAQ#Symbol_usage_from_assembly_language Refs: #35957 Refs: #38335 Signed-off-by: Jesse Chan <jc@linux.com> PR-URL: #38346 Refs: #35957 Refs: #38335 Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
"PushAllRegistersAndIterateStack" is implemented in assembly and called from "stack.cc" via 'extern "C"'. [1] However, LTO does not work well with symbol usage from assembly. [2] This change workarounds the issue by disabling LTO for the target. With GCC 10 and "./configure --enable-lto", compilation succeeds after this change. [1] v8/v8@c10863153 [2] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimizationFAQ#Symbol_usage_from_assembly_language Refs: #35957 Refs: #38335 Signed-off-by: Jesse Chan <jc@linux.com> PR-URL: #38346 Refs: #35957 Refs: #38335 Reviewed-By: Khaidi Chu <i@2333.moe> Reviewed-By: Richard Lau <rlau@redhat.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
"PushAllRegistersAndIterateStack" is implemented in assembly and
called from "stack.cc" via 'extern "C"'. [1]
However, LTO does not work well with symbol usage from assembly. [2]
This change workarounds the issue by disabling LTO for the target.
With GCC 10 and "./configure --enable-lto", compilation succeeds
after this change.
[1] v8/v8@c10863153
[2] https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/LinkTimeOptimizationFAQ#Symbol_usage_from_assembly_language
Refs: #35957
Refs: #38335
Signed-off-by: Jesse Chan jc@linux.com