-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[v14.x] backport process.exit changes #38786
Closed
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on the heap should be: 1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer referenced, or 2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer referenced, or 3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop alive, or 4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here) There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally, if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing `MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object. In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode (where --verify-base-objects is always-on). In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues that were fixed in the PRs referenced below. Refs: nodejs#35488 Refs: nodejs#35487 Refs: nodejs#35481 PR-URL: nodejs#35490 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
../src/env.cc:1227:22: error: lambda capture 'this' is not used [-Werror,-Wunused-lambda-capture] ForEachBaseObject([this](BaseObject* obj) { ^~~~ PR-URL: nodejs#35547 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
This addresses a TODO comment, and removes invalid `.ToLocalChecked()` calls from our code base. PR-URL: nodejs#35486 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
github-actions
bot
added
c++
Issues and PRs that require attention from people who are familiar with C++.
lib / src
Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
needs-ci
PRs that need a full CI run.
v14.x
labels
May 23, 2021
jasnell
approved these changes
May 23, 2021
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2021
When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on the heap should be: 1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer referenced, or 2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer referenced, or 3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop alive, or 4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here) There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally, if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing `MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object. In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode (where --verify-base-objects is always-on). In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues that were fixed in the PRs referenced below. Refs: #35488 Refs: #35487 Refs: #35481 PR-URL: #35490 Backport-PR-URL: #38786 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 25, 2021
../src/env.cc:1227:22: error: lambda capture 'this' is not used [-Werror,-Wunused-lambda-capture] ForEachBaseObject([this](BaseObject* obj) { ^~~~ PR-URL: #35547 Backport-PR-URL: #38786 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Landed in 55d0cd8...2ec28e4 |
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2021
When a process exits cleanly, i.e. because the event loop ends up without things to wait for, the Node.js objects that are left on the heap should be: 1. weak, i.e. ready for garbage collection once no longer referenced, or 2. detached, i.e. scheduled for destruction once no longer referenced, or 3. an unrefed libuv handle, i.e. does not keep the event loop alive, or 4. an inactive libuv handle (essentially the same here) There are a few exceptions to this rule, but generally, if there are C++-backed Node.js objects on the heap that do not fall into the above categories, we may be looking at a potential memory leak. Most likely, the cause is a missing `MakeWeak()` call on the corresponding object. In order to avoid this kind of problem, we check the list of BaseObjects for these criteria. In this commit, we only do so when explicitly instructed to or when in debug mode (where --verify-base-objects is always-on). In particular, this avoids the kinds of memory leak issues that were fixed in the PRs referenced below. Refs: #35488 Refs: #35487 Refs: #35481 PR-URL: #35490 Backport-PR-URL: #38786 Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Matteo Collina <matteo.collina@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Rich Trott <rtrott@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Joyee Cheung <joyeec9h3@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
targos
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 11, 2021
../src/env.cc:1227:22: error: lambda capture 'this' is not used [-Werror,-Wunused-lambda-capture] ForEachBaseObject([this](BaseObject* obj) { ^~~~ PR-URL: #35547 Backport-PR-URL: #38786 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Shelley Vohr <codebytere@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gus Caplan <me@gus.host> Reviewed-By: Gireesh Punathil <gpunathi@in.ibm.com> Reviewed-By: Jiawen Geng <technicalcute@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport: