-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
url: revert "validate ipv4 part length" #42940
Conversation
This reverts commit 87d0d7a. Refs: nodejs#42915
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Don't we usually keep the revert message created by Git?
Looking at |
Our release tooling does have special treatment for the standard git revert message format. I’d rather edit our commit message guidelines to reflect that than ignore it 🙂 e.g. https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/1d8a320a04d75b2143be0bc97b10dfcd9e64defa/doc/changelogs/CHANGELOG_V16.md#commits-3 contains
|
Since this is a revert, is it reasonable to fast-track so it can be included in the 3rd May builds? |
This PR and the on it reverts has the https://github.com/nodejs/node/labels/dont-land-on-v18.x, so none will be included on May 3rd release anyway :) |
Landed in a3ff4bf |
This reverts commit 87d0d7a.
Refs: #42915 (comment)