Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

esm: wrap initialize hook test-cases in describe block #49581

Closed

Conversation

GeoffreyBooth
Copy link
Member

This moves the tests for the initialize hook into a describe block, like the tests for the other hooks. This is split off from #49144 so that it can land and be backported without being blocked for backport like #49144.

It’s easier to review this if you hide whitespace changes. @nodejs/loaders

@GeoffreyBooth GeoffreyBooth added test Issues and PRs related to the tests. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. loaders Issues and PRs related to ES module loaders labels Sep 10, 2023
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Fast-track has been requested by @GeoffreyBooth. Please 👍 to approve.

@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added esm Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation. needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. labels Sep 10, 2023
@nodejs-github-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

@aduh95
Copy link
Contributor

aduh95 commented Sep 10, 2023

Isn’t that a duplicate of #49532 (minus the added tests)?

@GeoffreyBooth
Copy link
Member Author

Isn’t that a duplicate of #49532 (minus the added tests)?

Ah sorry I thought that one just added tests. Sure, we can close this in favor of that.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
esm Issues and PRs related to the ECMAScript Modules implementation. fast-track PRs that do not need to wait for 48 hours to land. loaders Issues and PRs related to ES module loaders needs-ci PRs that need a full CI run. test Issues and PRs related to the tests.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants