lib: scope loop variables #4965
Closed
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Refactor instances in `lib` where a loop variable is redeclared in the same scope with `var`. In these cases, `let` can be used to scope the variable declarations more precisely.
Trott
added
lts-watch-v4.x
lib / src
|
IMHO with regard to these variable definition changes, I think we should either avoid or at least be careful with using |
|
@mscdex I've changed this to avoid the whole "Is |
|
LGTM |
|
LGTM |
jasnell
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 1, 2016
Refactor instances in `lib` where a loop variable is redeclared in the same scope with `var`. In these cases, `let` can be used to scope the variable declarations more precisely. PR-URL: #4965 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
|
Landed in 089d84f |
rvagg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 8, 2016
Refactor instances in `lib` where a loop variable is redeclared in the same scope with `var`. In these cases, `let` can be used to scope the variable declarations more precisely. PR-URL: #4965 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 17, 2016
Refactor instances in `lib` where a loop variable is redeclared in the same scope with `var`. In these cases, `let` can be used to scope the variable declarations more precisely. PR-URL: #4965 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 18, 2016
Refactor instances in `lib` where a loop variable is redeclared in the same scope with `var`. In these cases, `let` can be used to scope the variable declarations more precisely. PR-URL: #4965 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Merged
MylesBorins
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 2, 2016
Refactor instances in `lib` where a loop variable is redeclared in the same scope with `var`. In these cases, `let` can be used to scope the variable declarations more precisely. PR-URL: #4965 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
scovetta
pushed a commit
to scovetta/node
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 2, 2016
Refactor instances in `lib` where a loop variable is redeclared in the same scope with `var`. In these cases, `let` can be used to scope the variable declarations more precisely. PR-URL: nodejs#4965 Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Refactor instances in
libwhere a loop variable is redeclared in thesame scope with
var. In these cases,letcan be used to scope thevariable declarations more precisely.