-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "test_runner: ignore unmapped lines for coverage" #55339
Revert "test_runner: ignore unmapped lines for coverage" #55339
Conversation
This reverts commit 3a42085.
Review requested:
|
Please drop the second commit. Just the revert. |
#55228 (comment) any consideration on this comment? Also, would you point which tests are failing, @RedYetiDev ? (if this info is public) |
261cb92
to
3b7f3d6
Compare
(From @cjihrig)
You can see this if you compare |
Fast tracking for the upcoming proposal(s). |
Fast-track has been requested by @RedYetiDev. Please 👍 to approve. |
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #55339 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 88.38% 88.41% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 652 652
Lines 186740 186714 -26
Branches 36036 36031 -5
==========================================
+ Hits 165058 165078 +20
+ Misses 14934 14896 -38
+ Partials 6748 6740 -8
|
@RafaelGSS said that he'll do a final sync with |
We need a green CI first. |
I can drop the original commit if this doesn't land. No need to rush if CI isn't green |
If this isn't green by the time you do your final sync, that's probably the best idea. Thanks! |
Commit Queue failed- Loading data for nodejs/node/pull/55339 ✔ Done loading data for nodejs/node/pull/55339 ----------------------------------- PR info ------------------------------------ Title Revert "test_runner: ignore unmapped lines for coverage" (#55339) Author Aviv Keller <redyetidev@gmail.com> (@RedYetiDev) Branch RedYetiDev:revert-55228-issue-55106 -> nodejs:main Labels test, fast-track, author ready, needs-ci, revert, dont-land-on-v18.x, test_runner, dont-land-on-v20.x, dont-land-on-v22.x Commits 1 - Revert "test_runner: ignore unmapped lines for coverage" Committers 1 - GitHub <noreply@github.com> PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55339 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il> ------------------------------ Generated metadata ------------------------------ PR-URL: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55339 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il> -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ℹ This PR was created on Wed, 09 Oct 2024 17:59:26 GMT ✔ Approvals: 2 ✔ - Colin Ihrig (@cjihrig): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55339#pullrequestreview-2357863538 ✔ - Chemi Atlow (@atlowChemi): https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55339#pullrequestreview-2358022594 ℹ This PR is being fast-tracked ✘ This PR needs to wait 6 more hours to land (or 0 hours if there are 2 more approvals (👍) of the fast-track request from collaborators). ✔ Last GitHub CI successful ℹ Last Full PR CI on 2024-10-11T08:57:38Z: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/63048/ - Querying data for job/node-test-pull-request/63048/ ✔ Last Jenkins CI successful -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ✔ Aborted `git node land` session in /home/runner/work/node/node/.ncuhttps://github.com/nodejs/node/actions/runs/11291355072 |
Landed in ccd4faf |
This reverts commit 3a42085. PR-URL: nodejs#55339 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
This reverts commit 3a42085. PR-URL: nodejs#55339 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Chemi Atlow <chemi@atlow.co.il>
Reverts #55228
This reverts a PR that was intended to fix #54753, however, the tests that it added where not accurate, and it actually does not pass the tests that it should pass.
Once this lands, I'll open a follow up with tests for this behavior so that this doesn't happen again.