Skip to content

doc: deprecate passing invalid types in fs.existsSync #55892

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Nov 25, 2024
Merged

doc: deprecate passing invalid types in fs.existsSync #55892

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
5 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
550c939
doc: deprecate passing invalid types in fs.existsSync
Ceres6 Nov 17, 2024
024adec
fixup! doc: deprecate passing invalid types in fs.existsSync
Ceres6 Nov 17, 2024
dd8e44d
Update doc/api/deprecations.md
Ceres6 Nov 20, 2024
9434bf1
Update doc/api/deprecations.md
Ceres6 Nov 20, 2024
390fc19
Update doc/api/deprecations.md
Ceres6 Nov 20, 2024
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
14 changes: 14 additions & 0 deletions doc/api/deprecations.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3772,6 +3772,20 @@ It is recommended to use the `new` qualifier instead. This applies to all REPL c

<!-- md-lint skip-deprecation DEP0186 -->

### DEP0187: Passing invalid argument types to `fs.existsSync`

<!-- YAML
changes:
- version: REPLACEME
pr-url: https://github.com/nodejs/node/pull/55892
description: Documentation-only.
-->

Type: Documentation-only

Passing non-supported argument types is deprecated and, instead of returning `false`,
will throw an error in a future version.

[NIST SP 800-38D]: https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/Legacy/SP/nistspecialpublication800-38d.pdf
[RFC 6066]: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6066#section-3
[RFC 8247 Section 2.4]: https://www.rfc-editor.org/rfc/rfc8247#section-2.4
Expand Down
Loading