Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Backport refactor src/node.js into internal files #5975

Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor

Pull Request check-list

  • Does make -j8 test (UNIX) or vcbuild test nosign (Windows) pass with
    this change (including linting)?
  • Is the commit message formatted according to CONTRIBUTING.md?

Affected core subsystem(s)

src,lib

Description of change

backport of #5103 onto v5.x

cc @evanlucas

PR-URL: nodejs#5103
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>

Conflicts:
	node.gyp
	src/node.js
PR-URL: nodejs#5103
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
PR-URL: nodejs#5103
Reviewed-By: Trevor Norris <trev.norris@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 added the lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory. label Mar 31, 2016
@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor Author

@evanlucas
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@Fishrock123 looks like this branch has conflicts (based on the github notice)

@Fishrock123
Copy link
Contributor Author

It didn't. I think that is because @evanlucas landed it?

@evanlucas
Copy link
Contributor

ah yea, sorry forgot to comment

@evanlucas
Copy link
Contributor

Landed in v5.x in 40847b0, a757e05, and e3c7b46

@evanlucas evanlucas closed this Mar 31, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lib / src Issues and PRs related to general changes in the lib or src directory.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants