Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

assert: Check typed array view type in deepEqual (backport to 4.x) #6147

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

addaleax
Copy link
Member

Checklist
  • tests and code linting passes
  • a test and/or benchmark is included
  • the commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

assert

Description of change

This is a backport of #5910 and is identical to what landed in master up to s/Buffer.from/new Buffer/.


Do not convert typed arrays to Buffer for deepEqual since their values may not be accurately represented by 8-bit ints. Instead perform binary comparison of underlying ArrayBuffers, but only when the array types match.

Never apply any kind of optimization for floating-point typed arrays since bit pattern equality is not the right kind of check for them.

Fixes: #5907 (introduced in #4330)

Do not convert typed arrays to `Buffer` for deepEqual since
their values may not be accurately represented by 8-bit ints.
Instead perform binary comparison of underlying `ArrayBuffer`s,
but only when the array types match.

Never apply any kind of optimization for floating-point typed
arrays since bit pattern equality is not the right kind of check
for them.

PR-URL: nodejs#5910
Reviewed-By: Benjamin Gruenbaum <benjamingr@gmail.com>
Fixes: nodejs#5907
@mscdex mscdex added assert Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem. v4.x labels Apr 11, 2016
@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

@addaleax thanks so much for this! I'm loving seeing the little verified tag next to your commit sha.

Just so you know our cherry-pick style will lose your signature as we create releases... that being said super cool it was included!!!

@MylesBorins
Copy link
Contributor

landed as f949c27

@addaleax
Copy link
Member Author

@thealphanerd No problem! 😄 And yep, I know the signature will be lost – it’s just a default I have set up because it’s a nice feature of git and it doesn’t really hurt anyone :)

@addaleax addaleax deleted the backport-5910-to-4.x branch April 11, 2016 16:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
assert Issues and PRs related to the assert subsystem.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants