-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tools: fix regression in doctool #6680
Conversation
ci: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/2569/ /cc @nodejs/documentation |
The changes regressed #5873 |
LGTM |
1 similar comment
LGTM |
58d7c44
to
3533f38
Compare
@thealphanerd I'd like to understand what went wrong here. Merging #3888 broke something other than the callsite signature in the test file that was merged at the end of April? How could I go about testing this to see how it fails (other than that mismatched callsite signature in the test file)? |
CI failures are unrelated. I've gone ahead and landed this on master to stop us from breaking CI. @jmm
|
Womp... didn't do good reading comprehension on your response. If you fix the signature in the test then two of the tests were still failing as Most likely there was an argument that didn't have I'd be interested to find out what caused the bug if you dig into it |
I saw in the CI report that there was a failure in
Really? When I check out that commit and update the calls to the updated signature from my PR I get no failure. That's with my existing Node though. I'm running the full |
@jmm I just tried retracing the steps again myself and was able to get the tests to pass as expected I'm not sure what was going on with my environment to get it to fail before. Odd. I was just as confused when this worked, but ran with it. I moved a little quicker than normal with this due to the tests being broken on master. I see no reason why you couldn't submit another PR that does some refactoring on the doc-tool if you would like to make a change to what is currently on master. |
@thealphanerd Ok, cool.
Totally understandable. Sorry the test was broken at all.
Sounds good. I still think converting those functions to take options hashes makes sense, so will do. |
These signatures were originally converted to opts hashes in nodejs#3888. That change was misinterpreted as the intrinsic cause of a test failure and reverted in nodejs#6680.
101dd1e introduced a regression in the doctool. This commit reverts the changes that were made to the function signature of the various doctool functions while maintaining support for passing in specific node versions. Refs: 101dd1e PR-URL: #6680 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com>
These signatures were originally converted to opts hashes in nodejs#3888. That change was misinterpreted as the intrinsic cause of a test failure and reverted in nodejs#6680. PR-URL: nodejs#6690 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Robert Jefe Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com>
101dd1e introduced a regression in the doctool. This commit reverts the changes that were made to the function signature of the various doctool functions while maintaining support for passing in specific node versions. Refs: nodejs@101dd1e PR-URL: nodejs#6680 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com>
These signatures were originally converted to opts hashes in nodejs#3888. That change was misinterpreted as the intrinsic cause of a test failure and reverted in nodejs#6680. PR-URL: nodejs#6690 Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Robert Jefe Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com>
101dd1e introduced a regression in the doctool. This commit reverts the changes that were made to the function signature of the various doctool functions while maintaining support for passing in specific node versions. Refs: 101dd1e PR-URL: #6680 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com>
101dd1e introduced a regression in the doctool. This commit reverts the changes that were made to the function signature of the various doctool functions while maintaining support for passing in specific node versions. Refs: 101dd1e PR-URL: #6680 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com>
101dd1e introduced a regression in the doctool. This commit reverts the changes that were made to the function signature of the various doctool functions while maintaining support for passing in specific node versions. Refs: 101dd1e PR-URL: #6680 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com>
101dd1e introduced a regression in the doctool. This commit reverts the changes that were made to the function signature of the various doctool functions while maintaining support for passing in specific node versions. Refs: 101dd1e PR-URL: #6680 Reviewed-By: Jeremiah Senkpiel <fishrock123@rocketmail.com> Reviewed-By: Robert Lindstaedt <robert.lindstaedt@gmail.com>
Checklist
Affected core subsystem(s)
tools
Description of change
101dd1e introduced a regression in the doctool. This commit reverts
the changes that were made to the function signature of the various
doctool functions while maintaining support for passing in specific
node versions.