-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 30k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
doc: reword ambigous docs for socket.setNoDelay #7995
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -625,15 +625,16 @@ initialDelay will leave the value unchanged from the default | |
|
||
Returns `socket`. | ||
|
||
### socket.setNoDelay([noDelay]) | ||
### socket.setNoDelay([enable]) | ||
<!-- YAML | ||
added: v0.1.90 | ||
--> | ||
|
||
Disables the Nagle algorithm. By default TCP connections use the Nagle | ||
algorithm, they buffer data before sending it off. Setting `true` for | ||
`noDelay` will immediately fire off data each time `socket.write()` is called. | ||
`noDelay` defaults to `true`. | ||
Sets `noDelay` option, which disables the Nagle algorithm. By default TCP | ||
connections use the Nagle algorithm, they buffer data before sending it off. | ||
Setting `true` for `noDelay` will immediately fire off data each time | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Note that it's still called There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. i understand it as |
||
`socket.write()` is called. | ||
`enable` defaults to `true`. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Another way this could be reworded is:
|
||
|
||
Returns `socket`. | ||
|
||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This breaks the links, I presume.
The following line should also be changed:
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That said, I'm not sure if it really makes sense to rename the argument to
enable
.Thoughs?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
it is too ambiguous otherwise and parameter name in code is
enable
: https://github.com/nodejs/node/blob/master/lib/net.js#L337There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This doesn't help, we used to have two concepts, "no delay" and "true/false", and we could tell that "nodelay" (the param name and method name) could be set to true.
Now, you enable (something?) and when something is enabled, "no delay" is... what? true? false? So I have to map enable to true, and true to "no delay" being on, which is a hop too many.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
or maybe when "enable" is false, nagle is disabled... so "no delay" is true? In which case, the meaning of true/false to this function would be inverted, so that's an API change, and we would never do it.