Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

doc: fix buf.readUIntBE, buf.readUIntLE examples #8240

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

mozkeeler
Copy link
Contributor

Checklist
  • documentation is changed or added
  • commit message follows commit guidelines
Affected core subsystem(s)

doc

Description of change

The documentation describing the output from the examples for
buf.readUIntBE and buf.readUIntLE were switched in terms of what the
code would actually output. This patch addresses this by switching the
two lines of example code to be in the same order as the functions are
listed earlier in the documentation.

The documentation describing the output from the examples for
buf.readUIntBE and buf.readUIntLE were switched in terms of what the
code would actually output. This patch addresses this by switching the
two lines of example code to be in the same order as the functions are
listed earlier in the documentation.
@nodejs-github-bot nodejs-github-bot added buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations. labels Aug 23, 2016
@jasnell
Copy link
Member

jasnell commented Aug 23, 2016

LGTM

2 similar comments
@mscdex
Copy link
Contributor

mscdex commented Aug 23, 2016

LGTM

@cjihrig
Copy link
Contributor

cjihrig commented Aug 24, 2016

LGTM

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

Thanks, looks good to me too!

@princejwesley
Copy link
Contributor

LGTM

@addaleax
Copy link
Member

Landed in 7f1bb80, thanks for the PR!

@addaleax addaleax closed this Aug 25, 2016
addaleax pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 25, 2016
The documentation describing the output from the examples for
buf.readUIntBE and buf.readUIntLE were switched in terms of what the
code would actually output. This patch addresses this by switching the
two lines of example code to be in the same order as the functions are
listed earlier in the documentation.

PR-URL: #8240
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <princejohnwesley@gmail.com>
@mozkeeler
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks!

@Fishrock123 Fishrock123 mentioned this pull request Sep 6, 2016
Fishrock123 pushed a commit to Fishrock123/node that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2016
The documentation describing the output from the examples for
buf.readUIntBE and buf.readUIntLE were switched in terms of what the
code would actually output. This patch addresses this by switching the
two lines of example code to be in the same order as the functions are
listed earlier in the documentation.

PR-URL: nodejs#8240
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <princejohnwesley@gmail.com>
Fishrock123 pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Sep 9, 2016
The documentation describing the output from the examples for
buf.readUIntBE and buf.readUIntLE were switched in terms of what the
code would actually output. This patch addresses this by switching the
two lines of example code to be in the same order as the functions are
listed earlier in the documentation.

PR-URL: #8240
Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Brian White <mscdex@mscdex.net>
Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com>
Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net>
Reviewed-By: Prince John Wesley <princejohnwesley@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
buffer Issues and PRs related to the buffer subsystem. doc Issues and PRs related to the documentations.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

8 participants