-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 29.6k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
test: fix freebsd10-64 CI failures #9317
Conversation
The changes LGTM. |
GREEN! CI IS GREEN! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
87ee25b
to
b2275cb
Compare
Running CI on this over and over to confirm there aren't other timer issues lurking in other tests, I found another timer to be removed in |
Still LGTM |
CI with the additional change: https://ci.nodejs.org/job/node-test-pull-request/4726/ |
Remove unneeded timers from some tests and move others from parallel testing to sequential testing. This is to resolve test failures on freebsd10-64 on CI. The failures are all due to timers firing later than expected. Timers firing later than they are set for can happen on resource-constrained hosts and is not a bug. In general, it may be wise to put tests that depend on timing into sequential testing rather than parallel testing, as the timing can be affected by other simultaneously-running test processes. Fixes: nodejs#8041 Fixes: nodejs#9227
2db56c1
to
571a612
Compare
Freebsd failure on last ci was Jenkins disconnect related. Had to rebase and force push to resolve a merge conflict with master anyway, so let's run CI again! |
Additional failing test on FreeBSD is unrelated. Will open a separate PR for it. |
Remove unneeded timers from some tests and move others from parallel testing to sequential testing. This is to resolve test failures on freebsd10-64 on CI. The failures are all due to timers firing later than expected. Timers firing later than they are set for can happen on resource-constrained hosts and is not a bug. In general, it may be wise to put tests that depend on timing into sequential testing rather than parallel testing, as the timing can be affected by other simultaneously-running test processes. Fixes: nodejs#8041 Fixes: nodejs#9227 PR-URL: nodejs#9317 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergstrom <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Landed in 6ef636c |
Remove unneeded timers from some tests and move others from parallel testing to sequential testing. This is to resolve test failures on freebsd10-64 on CI. The failures are all due to timers firing later than expected. Timers firing later than they are set for can happen on resource-constrained hosts and is not a bug. In general, it may be wise to put tests that depend on timing into sequential testing rather than parallel testing, as the timing can be affected by other simultaneously-running test processes. Fixes: #8041 Fixes: #9227 PR-URL: #9317 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergstrom <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Remove unneeded timers from some tests and move others from parallel testing to sequential testing. This is to resolve test failures on freebsd10-64 on CI. The failures are all due to timers firing later than expected. Timers firing later than they are set for can happen on resource-constrained hosts and is not a bug. In general, it may be wise to put tests that depend on timing into sequential testing rather than parallel testing, as the timing can be affected by other simultaneously-running test processes. Fixes: #8041 Fixes: #9227 PR-URL: #9317 Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Anna Henningsen <anna@addaleax.net> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Julien Gilli <jgilli@nodejs.org> Reviewed-By: Johan Bergstrom <bugs@bergstroem.nu> Reviewed-By: Santiago Gimeno <santiago.gimeno@gmail.com>
Move test-http-server-keep-alive-timeout-slow-server and test-http-server-keep-alive-timeout-slow-client-headers from parallel to sequential to (hopefully) resolve test flakiness on freebsd10-64. Refs: nodejs#14033 Refs: nodejs#9317
Move test-http-server-keep-alive-timeout-slow-server and test-http-server-keep-alive-timeout-slow-client-headers from parallel to sequential to resolve test flakiness on freebsd10-64. Fixes: #14033 Refs: #9317 PR-URL: #14377 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Move test-http-server-keep-alive-timeout-slow-server and test-http-server-keep-alive-timeout-slow-client-headers from parallel to sequential to resolve test flakiness on freebsd10-64. Fixes: #14033 Refs: #9317 PR-URL: #14377 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Move test-http-server-keep-alive-timeout-slow-server and test-http-server-keep-alive-timeout-slow-client-headers from parallel to sequential to resolve test flakiness on freebsd10-64. Fixes: #14033 Refs: #9317 PR-URL: #14377 Reviewed-By: Refael Ackermann <refack@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Colin Ihrig <cjihrig@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Luigi Pinca <luigipinca@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: James M Snell <jasnell@gmail.com> Reviewed-By: Gibson Fahnestock <gibfahn@gmail.com>
Checklist
make -j8 test
(UNIX), orvcbuild test nosign
(Windows) passesAffected core subsystem(s)
test
Description of change
Remove unneeded timers from some tests and move others from parallel
testing to sequential testing.
This is to resolve test failures on freebsd10-64 on CI. The failures
are all due to timers firing later than expected. Timers firing later
than they are set for can happen on resource-constrained hosts and is
not a bug.
In general, it may be wise to put tests that depend on timing into
sequential testing rather than parallel testing, as the timing can
be affected by other simultaneously-running test processes.
I ran this change set (with one fewer files moved to sequential, so not quite this change set) through CI six times and there were no failures on freebsd10-64. I did the same with current master and two of the six runs failed with tests involved in this PR. (I'll probably do at least that many again now that it's a PR.)
/cc @nodejs/testing @nodejs/platform-freebsd @misterdjules