feat(ci): request reviews from API experts

[avivkeller]

Description

This is a potential solution for the linked issues, via mapping article -> api -> owner.

Prereqs:

• @nodejs/typescript write access revoked
• @nodejs/security-wg write access revoked¹

Validation

See #8040 (comment). In a real PR, these teams will be pinged.

Related Issues

Fixes #7292
Fixes #7294

Footnotes

1. Unless they have it for a different reason ↩

[vercel]

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Preview	Updated (UTC)
nodejs-org	Ready	Preview	Nov 24, 2025 5:28pm

[codecov]

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 76.29%. Comparing base (bfaa6f8) to head (cd9d959).
⚠️ Report is 4 commits behind head on main.
✅ All tests successful. No failed tests found.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #8040      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.22%   76.29%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         118      118              
  Lines        9903     9903              
  Branches      337      336       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits         7549     7555       +6     
+ Misses       2352     2346       -6     
  Partials        2        2              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[github-actions]

Requesting a review from the following teams:

• nodejs/timers
• nodejs/events
• nodejs/repl
• nodejs/diagnostics
• nodejs/npm
• nodejs/undici
• nodejs/security-wg
• nodejs/fs
• nodejs/addon-api
• nodejs/test_runner
• nodejs/typescript

[Copilot]

Pull Request Overview

This PR implements a new automated reviewer assignment system for Node.js documentation by mapping articles to API domains and their respective expert teams. The change replaces static CODEOWNERS assignments with dynamic review requests based on frontmatter metadata.

• Adds api frontmatter field to 51 learning documentation files to categorize content by Node.js API domain
• Creates automated GitHub workflow to request reviews from appropriate API expert teams
• Removes static CODEOWNERS entries for TypeScript and security content in favor of the new dynamic system

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 54 out of 54 changed files in this pull request and generated 2 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
Multiple learn/*.md files	Added api frontmatter field to categorize content by Node.js API domain
.github/workflows/request-review.yml	New workflow to automatically request reviews based on API categorization
.github/scripts/get-reviewers.mjs	Script to parse frontmatter and map APIs to reviewer teams
.github/reviewers.json	Configuration mapping API domains to GitHub teams
.github/CODEOWNERS	Removed static assignments for TypeScript and security content

Comments suppressed due to low confidence (1)

.github/scripts/get-reviewers.mjs:40

• [nitpick] The parameter name 'content' is too generic. Consider renaming it to 'fileContent' or 'markdownContent' to better indicate what it contains.

  if (!content.trimStart().startsWith('---')) {

[github-actions]

Lighthouse Results

URL	Performance	Accessibility	Best Practices	SEO	Report
/en	🟢 99	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 100	🔗
/en/about	🟢 100	🟢 97	🟢 100	🟠 88	🔗
/en/about/previous-releases	🟢 100	🟢 93	🟢 100	🟠 89	🔗
/en/download	🟢 95	🟢 100	🟢 100	🟢 100	🔗
/en/blog	🟢 99	🟢 100	🟢 96	🟢 100	🔗

[avivkeller]

Also, can someone confirm that pkgjs/request-codeowner-review is allowed in this repo, after, I can test to verify this works

Bump @nodejs/web-admins

[avivkeller]

@ovflowd @bmuenzenmeyer bump x2

[bmuenzenmeyer]

Sorry. Will try to look soon. Tuesdays and Wednesdays are tough for me

[bmuenzenmeyer]

LGTM

[avivkeller]

Waiting for:

The action pkgjs/request-codeowner-review@0acf2fd is not allowed in nodejs/nodejs.org because all actions must be from a repository owned by your enterprise, created by GitHub, or match one of the patterns: LoveToKnow/slackify-markdown-action@, MishaKav/jest-coverage-comment@, actions-ecosystem/action-remove-labels@, chromaui/action@, codecov/codecov-action@, codecov/test-results-action@, crowdin/github-action@, gr2m/create-or-update-pull-request-action@, ossf/scorecard-action@, patrickedqvist/wait-for-vercel-preview@, pnpm/action-setup@, rtCamp/action-slack-notify@, stefanzweifel/git-auto-commit-action@, step-security/harden-runner@, thollander/actions-comment-pull-request@, treosh/lighthouse-ci-action@.

To complete testing

[avivkeller]

Sorry. Will try to look soon. Tuesdays and Wednesdays are tough for me

@bmuenzenmeyer can you enable this action?

[bmuenzenmeyer]

Sorry. Will try to look soon. Tuesdays and Wednesdays are tough for me

@bmuenzenmeyer can you enable this action?

@avivkeller done

[github-actions]

👋 Codeowner Review Request

The following codeowners have been identified for the changed files:

Team reviewers: @nodejs/web-infra

Please review the changes when you have a chance. Thank you! 🙏

[avivkeller]

Testing looks good! Note that the comment was made multiple times in this PR for two different tests, in a real scenario, the comment will only be made on PR open