-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
Open
Description
Version
22.0.0
Platform
Linux debian 6.1.0-13-amd64 nodejs/node#1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Debian 6.1.55-1 (2023-09-29) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Subsystem
No response
What steps will reproduce the bug?
const COUNT1 = 1024;
const COUNT2 = 5120;
const COUNT3 = 20480;
function encrypt(buf, value = 199)
{
let count = Math.min(buf.length, COUNT1);
for (let i = 0; i < count; i++)
buf[i] += value;
count = Math.min(buf.length, COUNT2);
for (let i = COUNT1; i < count; i += 2)
buf[i] += value;
}
const buf = Buffer.alloc(65535);
function aa()
{
console.time("j");
for (let i = 0; i < 20 * 125; i++)
encrypt(buf, 199);
console.timeEnd("j");
}
for (let index = 0; index < 20; index++) {
aa()
}When I increase the number of operations, due to the optimization of v8, the performance will be shortened to 23ms, but it is still worse than the previous 21ms performance.
How often does it reproduce? Is there a required condition?
node perf.js
What is the expected behavior? Why is that the expected behavior?
in nodejs 20.12.2
j: 64.709ms
j: 54.228ms
j: 21.822ms
j: 21.83ms
j: 21.858ms
j: 21.851ms
j: 21.821ms
j: 21.841ms
j: 21.827ms
j: 21.887ms
j: 21.823ms
j: 21.863ms
j: 21.842ms
j: 21.857ms
j: 21.845ms
j: 21.851ms
j: 21.821ms
j: 21.843ms
j: 21.816ms
j: 21.847ms
in nodejs 22.0.0
j: 44.602ms
j: 34.992ms
j: 35.053ms
j: 34.981ms
j: 35.355ms
j: 35.013ms
j: 35.036ms
j: 34.979ms
j: 35.056ms
j: 35.135ms
j: 35.09ms
j: 34.989ms
j: 35.023ms
j: 34.974ms
j: 35.028ms
j: 35.076ms
j: 35.034ms
j: 34.973ms
j: 35.045ms
j: 35.013ms
What do you see instead?
1
Additional information
1
birgersp and jdmarshall
Metadata
Metadata
Assignees
Labels
No labels