Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Handle trait dispatch in the comptime interpreter #4925

Closed
Tracked by #4594
jfecher opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5376
Closed
Tracked by #4594

Handle trait dispatch in the comptime interpreter #4925

jfecher opened this issue Apr 25, 2024 · 1 comment · Fixed by #5376
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@jfecher
Copy link
Contributor

jfecher commented Apr 25, 2024

Problem

The comptime interpreter currently fails whenever a trait is needed.

Happy Case

The comptime interpreter should be able to handle trait dispatch, including operator overloading.

Project Impact

None

Impact Context

No response

Workaround

None

Workaround Description

No response

Additional Context

No response

Would you like to submit a PR for this Issue?

None

Support Needs

No response

@jfecher
Copy link
Contributor Author

jfecher commented Jun 25, 2024

Relevant TODO for operator overloading here:

// TODO: Need to account for operator overloading
assert!(
self.interner.get_selected_impl_for_expression(id).is_none(),
"Operator overloading is unimplemented in the interpreter"
);

github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 25, 2024
# Description

## Problem\*


## Summary\*

This PR replaces a panic with a nicer error plus a link to the relevant
issue: #4925

## Additional Context



## Documentation\*

Check one:
- [x] No documentation needed.
- [ ] Documentation included in this PR.
- [ ] **[For Experimental Features]** Documentation to be submitted in a
separate PR.

# PR Checklist\*

- [x] I have tested the changes locally.
- [x] I have formatted the changes with [Prettier](https://prettier.io/)
and/or `cargo fmt` on default settings.

---------

Co-authored-by: jfecher <jake@aztecprotocol.com>
github-merge-queue bot pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 2, 2024
# Description

## Problem\*

Resolves #4925

## Summary\*

Implements trait dispatch in the interpreter - which includes operator
overloading.

## Additional Context

I've tried to share as much code as I can between the interpreter and
monomorphization.

Most of this PR is rather straightforward adapting code in the
monomorphizer to use in the interpreter. The main new bit of code is a
stack of `FunctionContext`s in the elaborator. I found at that when
having a comptime block in the middle of a function, even a known trait
would panic that it had no impl. This was because we previously delayed
solving impls to the very end of a function when types were known. I've
had to change this into a stack instead so that we can solve impls that
were done within a comptime block at the end of that comptime block,
just before interpreting so that they'd be defined. Similarly, the
`type_variables` list also needed to be placed here since defaulting
types can cause some trait constraints to succeed/fail without it. I
settled on `function_context` for the name of this stack but am not sure
if it fits the case where we have a stack of comptime contexts instead.
Similarly, `ComptimeContext` also didn't make sense for the more common
case of only having one of them for a function with no comptime blocks.

## Documentation\*

Check one:
- [x] No documentation needed.
- [ ] Documentation included in this PR.
- [ ] **[For Experimental Features]** Documentation to be submitted in a
separate PR.

# PR Checklist\*

- [x] I have tested the changes locally.
- [x] I have formatted the changes with [Prettier](https://prettier.io/)
and/or `cargo fmt` on default settings.
@github-project-automation github-project-automation bot moved this from 📋 Backlog to ✅ Done in Noir Jul 2, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
Status: ✅ Done
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant