Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(ssa refactor): Handle Brillig calls #1744

Merged
merged 17 commits into from
Jun 20, 2023
Merged

Conversation

kevaundray
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Problem*

Resolves

Summary*

Documentation

  • This PR requires documentation updates when merged.

    • I will submit a noir-lang/docs PR.
    • I will request for and support Dev Rel's help in documenting this PR.

Additional Context

PR Checklist*

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt on default settings.

* fix: entry point and exit point handling

* feat: function linking

* docs: added comments

* docs: more comments
@ludamad
Copy link
Collaborator

ludamad commented Jun 19, 2023

Ah, my bad with usize_op - I had started with brillig to list destination first as that is intel x86 convention/seemed more common so my brain went there

@kevaundray
Copy link
Contributor Author

Changes look okay to me -- going to give it a once over again tomorrow, then we can open an issue re jumps in function calls

@kevaundray kevaundray marked this pull request as ready for review June 20, 2023 09:57
@kevaundray kevaundray changed the title chore(ssa refactor): Handle Brillig calls [DO NOT MERGE] chore(ssa refactor): Handle Brillig calls Jun 20, 2023
@kevaundray
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sirasistant Looks good to me, can you approve?

sirasistant
sirasistant previously approved these changes Jun 20, 2023
Copy link
Contributor

@sirasistant sirasistant left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

sure!

@kevaundray kevaundray added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 20, 2023
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to a conflict with the base branch Jun 20, 2023
@sirasistant sirasistant enabled auto-merge June 20, 2023 12:02
@sirasistant sirasistant added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 20, 2023
@github-merge-queue github-merge-queue bot removed this pull request from the merge queue due to no response for status checks Jun 20, 2023
@sirasistant sirasistant added this pull request to the merge queue Jun 20, 2023
@sirasistant
Copy link
Contributor

Had to add it to the merge queue again because seems like some CI step stalled and didn't give output

@ludamad
Copy link
Collaborator

ludamad commented Jun 20, 2023

I keep looking and being surprised this isnt in master :D

Merged via the queue into master with commit 2bb9e70 Jun 20, 2023
@sirasistant sirasistant deleted the kw/x86-call-instruction branch June 20, 2023 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants