Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: refactor LSP crate layout #3170

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023
Merged

chore: refactor LSP crate layout #3170

merged 3 commits into from
Oct 16, 2023

Conversation

TomAFrench
Copy link
Member

Description

Problem*

Resolves

Summary*

This PR continues the refactoring of the layout of the LSP crate. The handlers for requests and notifications have been split into separate files. So has the BlackBoxFunctionSolver implementation.

I've also replaced some of the usage of for-loops and explicit vec pushing with iterators.

There should be zero changes in functionality in this PR.

Documentation

  • This PR requires documentation updates when merged.

    • I will submit a noir-lang/docs PR.
    • I will request for and support Dev Rel's help in documenting this PR.

Additional Context

PR Checklist*

  • I have tested the changes locally.
  • I have formatted the changes with Prettier and/or cargo fmt on default settings.

@TomAFrench TomAFrench enabled auto-merge October 16, 2023 09:55
@TomAFrench TomAFrench added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 16, 2023
Merged via the queue into master with commit fc73a9e Oct 16, 2023
@TomAFrench TomAFrench deleted the tf/lsp-refactor branch October 16, 2023 10:26
TomAFrench added a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 16, 2023
* master:
  chore: refactor LSP crate layout (#3170)
Sakapoi pushed a commit to Sakapoi/noir_fork that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
signorecello pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants