Skip to content

Footer label in shared documents #154

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
almereyda opened this issue Nov 29, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #155
Closed

Footer label in shared documents #154

almereyda opened this issue Nov 29, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #155

Comments

@almereyda
Copy link

The footer in shared documents reads:

Built with Notea.

This sounds a little technical, and might not always catch the vibe of the documents, which are often not built but created (gestalten). Couldn't it be much nicer, if we didn't focus the software here, but what it's for?

Something like those could maybe sound much warmer?

Written in Notea.

Written with Notea.

Authored in Notea.

etc.

If one wanted to use the spot to gain attention for Notea, the strings could also be slowly changing and fading from one to the other, catching the eye even more easily.

tecc added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 29, 2022
rewording: Previously, the footer said "Built with", which makes it seem too technical. This just changes it to "Written with", which is a more accurate portrayal. Fixes #154.
updated-link: The new link is https://github.com/notea-org/notea, which is preferred to the previous link (https://cinwell.com/notea) if a website for Notea is necessary.
@tecc
Copy link
Member

tecc commented Nov 29, 2022

I do agree with you, and made a version where it's worded as "Written with".
Feel free to try it locally: https://github.com/notea-org/notea/tree/fix/154-footer-rewording.

@tecc tecc closed this as completed in #155 Dec 3, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants