-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Always save package_lock.json when using --package-lock-only
#146
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Instead of throwing, is there some reason that --package-lock-only
can't imply --package-lock
?
My use case is:
|
Just implying package-lock doesn't seem outrageous, and as you're our biggest window into |
to be clear, i also think Thanks! |
be9f550
to
88f1e1b
Compare
Makes sense to me! |
88f1e1b
to
b39a196
Compare
--package-lock-only
with package-lock: false
--package-lock-only
--package-lock-only
--package-lock-only
…y` (#146) PR-URL: #146 Credit: @aeschright Reviewed-By: @zkat
No description provided.