fix: arborist libc manifest
#7126
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ljharb
reviewed
Jan 10, 2024
Co-authored-by: Jordan Harband <ljharb@gmail.com>
|
A branch to fix the npm tests for |
Merged
styfle
added a commit
to styfle/packagephobia
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 24, 2024
Bumps to [`npm@10.4.0`](https://github.com/npm/cli/releases/tag/v10.4.0) which adds a fix for [arborist](npm/cli#7126) which will avoid installing multiple libc binaries and [correctly select glibc vs musl](npm/rfcs#438) from the optionalDependencies.
2 tasks
|
This change introduces issues when installing global packages that have transient dependencies like |
2 tasks
lukekarrys
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 3, 2024
Somewhat related to #7276 and #7463. I don't think there is a reason to cache the promise here. And if we ever did choose to replace this with an LRUCache we would need to know the size of what we are caching which will be easier if we only cache the resulting manifest. I also added a comment about why I think we are removing the license from manifests here. License was removed in #7126 which looks to be a purposeful change but I could not find a reason. Adding the license back in causes many snapshots to fail because the license is now present in lockfiles, so that's how I came up with the comment.
2 tasks
lukekarrys
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
May 6, 2024
Somewhat related to #7276 and #7463. I don't think there is a reason to cache the promise here. And if we ever did choose to replace this with an LRUCache we would need to know the size of what we are caching which will be easier if we only cache the resulting manifest. I also added a comment about why I think we are removing the license from manifests here. License was removed in #7126 which looks to be a purposeful change but I could not find a reason. Adding the license back in causes many snapshots to fail because the license is now present in lockfiles, so that's how I came up with the comment.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
--libcoption to override platform specific install #6914