Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Cleanup key ids #19960

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Cleanup key ids #19960

wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

hakonfam
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Specifically:
- There are only 3 generations
- Incorrect USAGE in AUTHDEBUG key definitions

Ref: NCSDK-NONE
Signed-off-by: Håkon Amundsen <haakon.amundsen@nordicsemi.no>
Ref: NCSDK-NONE
Signed-off-by: Håkon Amundsen <haakon.amundsen@nordicsemi.no>
@hakonfam hakonfam requested a review from a team as a code owner January 17, 2025 05:54
@github-actions github-actions bot added the changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. label Jan 17, 2025
@hakonfam hakonfam added this to the 2.9.0-nRF54H20-2 milestone Jan 17, 2025
@hakonfam hakonfam added backport v2.9-nRF54H20-branch and removed changelog-entry-required Update changelog before merge. Remove label if entry is not needed or already added. labels Jan 17, 2025
@NordicBuilder
Copy link
Contributor

NordicBuilder commented Jan 17, 2025

CI Information

To view the history of this post, clich the 'edited' button above
Build number: 1

Inputs:

Sources:

sdk-nrf: PR head: dc39c517245dfc730c54bd046409da413634159d

more details

sdk-nrf:

PR head: dc39c517245dfc730c54bd046409da413634159d
merge base: 020cc3fe3ac6adc8f2a26972768a8a594b19a8c4
target head (main): 020cc3fe3ac6adc8f2a26972768a8a594b19a8c4
Diff

Github labels

Enabled Name Description
ci-disabled Disable the ci execution
ci-all-test Run all of ci, no test spec filtering will be done
ci-force-downstream Force execution of downstream even if twister fails
ci-run-twister Force run twister
ci-run-zephyr-twister Force run zephyr twister
List of changed files detected by CI (2)
subsys
│  ├── nrf_security
│  │  ├── include
│  │  │  ├── psa
│  │  │  │  │ nrf_platform_key_ids.h
│  │  ├── src
│  │  │  ├── drivers
│  │  │  │  ├── cracen
│  │  │  │  │  ├── cracenpsa
│  │  │  │  │  │  ├── src
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  ├── platform_keys
│  │  │  │  │  │  │  │  │ platform_keys.c

Outputs:

Toolchain

Version: 342151af73
Build docker image: docker-dtr.nordicsemi.no/sw-production/ncs-build:342151af73_912848a074

Test Spec & Results: ✅ Success; ❌ Failure; 🟠 Queued; 🟡 Progress; ◻️ Skipped; ⚠️ Quarantine

  • ◻️ Toolchain - Skipped: existing toolchain is used
  • ✅ Build twister
    • sdk-nrf test count: 1645
  • ❌ Integration tests
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-chip
    • ✅ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf_crypto
    • ❌ test-fw-nrfconnect-tfm
    • ✅ test-sdk-find-my
    • ✅ test-sdk-sidewalk
    • ✅ test-sdk-dfu
    • ⚠️ test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_cloud
Disabled integration tests
    • desktop52_verification
    • doc-internal
    • test_ble_nrf_config
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-apps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_mesh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ble_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-boot
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-fem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nfc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_libmodem-nrf
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_mosh
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_nrf_provisioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_positioning
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_samples
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_serial_lte_modem
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_thingy91
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-nrf-iot_zephyr_lwm2m
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-ps
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rpc
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-rs
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-thread
    • test-fw-nrfconnect-zigbee
    • test-low-level
    • test-sdk-audio
    • test-sdk-mcuboot
    • test-sdk-pmic-samples
    • test-sdk-wifi
    • test-secdom-samples-public

Note: This message is automatically posted and updated by the CI

Copy link
Contributor

@frkv frkv left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@Vge0rge Vge0rge self-requested a review January 17, 2025 09:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants