Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SUVbw value are different for DRO Washington Image than required per QIBA profile #399

Closed
namanhshah opened this issue Apr 27, 2023 · 1 comment
Milestone

Comments

@namanhshah
Copy link

namanhshah commented Apr 27, 2023

Describe the bug
When I tried getting the SUVbw values for University of Washington Imaging Research Laboratory Digital Reference Object available at https://depts.washington.edu/petctdro/downloads/DRO_20130529.zip, values are not as per required behavior described in QIBA profile for PET-CT (Page 68 of https://qibawiki.rsna.org/images/1/1f/QIBA_FDG-PET_Profile_v113.pdf). I have assessed the values in RadiANT as well as OHIF viewer for the reference which meets the requirement described in QIBA profile.

Expected behavior
SUVbw values should meet DRO values required per QIBA profile.

Additional context
Can you help me understand the issue here as I have some old work done on the Weasis and need to correct those works.

Screenshots
Attached screenshot with Weasis, OHIF and RadiANT viewer
Weasis 4.0.3 Screenshot:
Screenshot 2023-04-27 172546
RadiANT Viewer (SUVbw):
Screenshot 2023-04-27 181901
RadiANT Viewer (in BQML):
Screenshot 2023-04-27 181757
OHIF Viewer:
Screenshot 2023-04-27 174508

@namanhshah namanhshah changed the title SUVbw value are not different for DRO Washington Image SUVbw value are different for DRO Washington Image than required per QIBA profile Apr 27, 2023
@nroduit
Copy link
Owner

nroduit commented Apr 27, 2023

Thanks for reporting this issue.

The problem is not in the calculation of the SUV factor but in the value of the input pixels. If I apply the Modality LUT values then I get the same results as Radiant or OHIF.

I asked the question on the DICOM forum because it seems not compatible with the BIR profile.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants