We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
/app/start.sh: line 8: /app/mikrotik-exporter: not found
PS:
/app # ls -la total 11432 drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Jul 6 02:21 . drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Jul 21 16:34 .. -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11689927 Jul 6 02:20 mikrotik-exporter -rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 195 Jul 6 02:20 start.sh /app # ./mikrotik-exporter sh: ./mikrotik-exporter: not found /app #
After some investigations i found that exist compatibily problem between your base image and executable:
More details here : https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54281646/executable-in-docker-image-not-found
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
use debian instead of alpine
fc9c04e
Fix for #40 * use debian instead of alpine * bump version to real release
stupid alpine. switch to debian stretch slim as base and confirmed it works on local server.
Sorry, something went wrong.
Use builder to build binary
dc69eba
Uses same env to build binary (alpine) as will be used to run in. Should not reintroduce nshttpd#40 Tested locally, all fine running in archlinux.
No branches or pull requests
/app/start.sh: line 8: /app/mikrotik-exporter: not found
PS:
/app # ls -la
total 11432
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Jul 6 02:21 .
drwxr-xr-x 1 root root 4096 Jul 21 16:34 ..
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 11689927 Jul 6 02:20 mikrotik-exporter
-rwxr-xr-x 1 root root 195 Jul 6 02:20 start.sh
/app # ./mikrotik-exporter
sh: ./mikrotik-exporter: not found
/app #
After some investigations i found that exist compatibily problem between your base image and executable:
More details here :
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/54281646/executable-in-docker-image-not-found
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: