Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adjust expected unclaimed GAS calculation for TestNEO_CalculateBonus #3596

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 4, 2024

Conversation

AnnaShaleva
Copy link
Member

Problem

Misleading expected unclaimed GAS calculation record in test.

Solution

Fix it, add some comments.

Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
The behaviour is the same, the result is also the same, but the meaning
is fixed.

Signed-off-by: Anna Shaleva <shaleva.ann@nspcc.ru>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.26%. Comparing base (9a38360) to head (fadfac7).
Report is 3 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3596   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.26%   85.26%           
=======================================
  Files         333      333           
  Lines       39005    39005           
=======================================
  Hits        33256    33256           
+ Misses       4177     4176    -1     
- Partials     1572     1573    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@AnnaShaleva
Copy link
Member Author

@AliceInHunterland, please ensure you understand reward calculations.

@roman-khimov roman-khimov merged commit b1068b1 into master Oct 4, 2024
20 checks passed
@roman-khimov roman-khimov deleted the fix-test branch October 4, 2024 10:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants