Skip to content

make the unexpected_internal_errror output smaller #13

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 14, 2023

Conversation

amtoine
Copy link
Member

@amtoine amtoine commented Oct 13, 2023

Can we simplify the matches: .... message? It's too long I think

Originally posted by @hustcer in #12 (comment)

description

when there is an unexpected_internal_error in tk get-latest-nightly-build, the output is too long.

this PR tries to make it more digest by only showing the names.

@amtoine amtoine requested a review from hustcer October 13, 2023 16:02
@amtoine
Copy link
Member Author

amtoine commented Oct 13, 2023

@hustcer
is that any better? 😇

@hustcer hustcer merged commit b237a90 into nushell:nightly Oct 14, 2023
@hustcer
Copy link
Contributor

hustcer commented Oct 14, 2023

Thanks, that's much better

@amtoine amtoine deleted the better-internal-error-message branch October 14, 2023 07:36
hustcer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 19, 2023
… (#10694)

(squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread)

Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310,


# Description
Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source
paths or globs.
Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a
different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different
globbing library).

The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and
only glob if it is not. That way,
a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob
quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell
parsing.

Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob
specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to
access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same
spelling.
```
> ls a*
╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮
│ # │  name  │ type │ size │    modified    │
├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤
│ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │  0 B │ 34 seconds ago │
│ 1 │ abd    │ file │  0 B │ now            │
│ 2 │ acd    │ file │  0 B │ now            │
╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯

> cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest
copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd
copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd

> ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access.
> cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest
Error:   × No matches found
   ╭─[entry #33:1:1]
 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest
   ·              ─────┬────
   ·                   ╰── no matches found
   ╰────

> #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting.
> cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest
copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d
```
Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user
gets a confusing error:

```
> touch 'a[b'
> cp 'a[b' dest
Error:   × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern
   ╭─[entry #13:1:1]
 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest
   ·    ──┬──
   ·      ╰── invalid pattern
   ╰────
```

After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only
as globs if not found to be files.

```
> cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest
copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d
> cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest
copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd
copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd
```
After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works.
(though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.).

```
> cp --verbose 'a[b' dest
copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b
```

So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling.
If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you
will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think
that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name,
s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it.

# User-Facing Changes
Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with
a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the
new version will process the file and not expand the glob.

# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->

# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->

---------

Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
hustcer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 15, 2024
<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx

you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->

# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.

Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->

Spreading lists automatically when calling externals was deprecated in
0.89 (#11289), and this PR is to remove it in 0.91.

# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->

The new error message looks like this:

```
>  ^echo [1 2]
Error: nu::shell::cannot_pass_list_to_external

  × Lists are not automatically spread when calling external commands
   ╭─[entry #13:1:8]
 1 │  ^echo [1 2]
   ·        ──┬──
   ·          ╰── Spread operator (...) is necessary to spread lists
   ╰────
  help: Either convert the list to a string or use the spread operator, like so: ...[1 2]
```

The old error message didn't say exactly where to put the `...` and
seemed to confuse a lot of people, so hopefully this helps.

# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path
crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->

There was one test to check that implicit spread was deprecated before,
updated that to check that it's disallowed now.

# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
hustcer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jun 8, 2024
# Description

Makes `to toml` use the `toml::value::Datetime` type, so that `to toml`
serializes dates properly.


# User-Facing Changes

`to toml` will now encode dates differently, in a native format instead
of a string. This could, in theory, break some workflows:

```Nushell
# Before:
~> {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime
Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000 (10 hours ago)
# After:
~> {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime
Error: nu::shell::only_supports_this_input_type

  × Input type not supported.
   ╭─[entry #13:1:36]
 1 │ {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime
   ·                                    ────┬────                  ──────┬──────
   ·                                        │                            ╰── only string and int input data is supported
   ·                                        ╰── input type: date
   ╰────
```

Fix #11751
hustcer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 26, 2025
…nt (#14903)

<!--
if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR
with
them by using one of the [*linking
keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword),
e.g.
- this PR should close #xxxx
- fixes #xxxx

you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions!
-->

# Description
<!--
Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing
guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major
changes.

Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or
screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience.
-->
This PR seeks to generalize the `seq date` command so that it can
receive any duration as an `--increment`. Whereas the current command
can only output a list of dates spaced at least 1 day apart, the new
command can output a list of datetimes that are spaced apart by any
duration.

For example:
```
> seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 6hr --output-format "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"
╭───┬─────────────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 00:00:00 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-01 06:00:00 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-01 12:00:00 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-01 18:00:00 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-02 00:00:00 │
╰───┴─────────────────────╯
```

Note that the default behavior remains unchanged:
```
> seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │
╰───┴────────────╯
```

The default output format also remains unchanged:
```
> seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 6hr
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-02 │
╰───┴────────────╯
```

# User-Facing Changes
<!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This
helps us keep track of breaking changes. -->

## Breaking Changes
* The `--increment` argument no longer accepts just an integer and
requires a duration

```
# NEW BEHAVIOR
> seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 1

Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch

  × Parse mismatch during operation.
   ╭─[entry #13:1:68]
 1 │ seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 1
   ·                                                                    ┬
   ·                                                                    ╰── expected duration with valid units
   ╰────
```

EDIT: Break Change is mitigated. `--increment` accepts either an integer
or duration.

## Bug Fix
* The `--days` argument had an off-by-one error and would print 1 too
many elements in the output. For example,

```
# OLD BEHAVIOR
> seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --increment 1
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │
│ 5 │ 2025-01-06 │ <-- Extra element
╰───┴────────────╯

# NEW BEHAVIOR
> seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --increment 1day
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │
╰───┴────────────╯
```

## New Argument
* A `--periods` argument is introduced to indicate the number of output
elements, regardless of the `--increment` value. Importantly, the
`--days` argument is ignored when `--periods` is set.
```
# NEW BEHAVIOR
> seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --periods 10 --increment 1day
╭───┬────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │
│ 5 │ 2025-01-06 │
│ 6 │ 2025-01-07 │
│ 7 │ 2025-01-08 │
│ 8 │ 2025-01-09 │
│ 9 │ 2025-01-10 │
╰───┴────────────╯
```

Note that the `--days` and `--periods` arguments differ in their
functions. The `--periods` value determines the number of elements in
the output that are always spaced `--increment` apart. The `--days`
value determines the bookends `--begin-date` and `--end-date` when only
one is set, though the number of elements may differ based on the
`--increment` value.

```
# NEW BEHAVIOR
> seq date -e 2025-01-01 --days 2 --increment 5hr --output-format "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S"

╭───┬─────────────────────╮
│ 0 │ 2025-01-23 22:25:05 │
│ 1 │ 2025-01-24 03:25:05 │
│ 2 │ 2025-01-24 08:25:05 │
│ 3 │ 2025-01-24 13:25:05 │
│ 4 │ 2025-01-24 18:25:05 │
╰───┴─────────────────────╯
```

# Tests + Formatting
<!--
Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes.

Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands:

- `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo
fmt --all` applies these changes)
- `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to
check that you're using the standard code style
- `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make
sure to [enable developer
mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging))
- `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the
tests for the standard library

> **Note**
> from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows
> ```bash
> use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it
automatically
> toolkit check pr
> ```
-->

I added several examples for each user-facing change in
`generators/seq_date.rs` and some tests in `tests/commands/seq_date.rs`.

# After Submitting
<!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the
documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the
PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date.
-->
hustcer pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 18, 2025
# Description
Type-check all closure arguments, not just required arguments.

Not doing so looks like an oversight.

# User-Facing Changes

Previously, passing an argument of the wrong type to a closure would
fail if the argument is required, but be accepted (ignoring the type
annotation) if the argument is optional:

```
> do {|x: string| $x} 4
Error: nu::shell::cant_convert

  × Can't convert to string.
   ╭─[entry #13:1:21]
 1 │ do {|x: string| $x} 4
   ·                     ┬
   ·                     ╰── can't convert int to string
   ╰────
> do {|x?: string| $x} 4
4
> do {|x?: string| $x} 4 | describe
int
```

It now fails the same way in both cases.

# Tests + Formatting
Added tests, the existing tests still pass.

Please let me know if I added the wrong type of test or added them in
the wrong place (I didn't spot similar tests in the nu-cmd-lang crate,
so I put them next to the most-related existing tests I could find...

# After Submitting
I think this is minor enough it doesn't need a doc update, but please
point me in the right direction if not.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants