-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8
make the unexpected_internal_errror output smaller #13
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
hustcer
merged 1 commit into
nushell:nightly
from
amtoine:better-internal-error-message
Oct 14, 2023
Merged
make the unexpected_internal_errror output smaller #13
hustcer
merged 1 commit into
nushell:nightly
from
amtoine:better-internal-error-message
Oct 14, 2023
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
@hustcer |
Thanks, that's much better |
hustcer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2023
… (#10694) (squashed version of #10557, clean commit history and review thread) Fixes #10571, also potentially: #10364, #10211, #9558, #9310, # Description Changes processing of arguments to filesystem commands that are source paths or globs. Applies to `cp, cp-old, mv, rm, du` but not `ls` (because it uses a different globbing interface) or `glob` (because it uses a different globbing library). The core of the change is to lookup the argument first as a file and only glob if it is not. That way, a path containing glob metacharacters can be referenced without glob quoting, though it will have to be single quoted to avoid nushell parsing. Before: A file path that looks like a glob is not matched by the glob specified as a (source) argument and takes some thinking about to access. You might say the glob pattern shadows a file with the same spelling. ``` > ls a* ╭───┬────────┬──────┬──────┬────────────────╮ │ # │ name │ type │ size │ modified │ ├───┼────────┼──────┼──────┼────────────────┤ │ 0 │ a[bc]d │ file │ 0 B │ 34 seconds ago │ │ 1 │ abd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ │ 2 │ acd │ file │ 0 B │ now │ ╰───┴────────┴──────┴──────┴────────────────╯ > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd > ## Note -- a[bc]d *not* copied, and seemingly hard to access. > cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest Error: × No matches found ╭─[entry #33:1:1] 1 │ cp --verbose 'a\[bc\]d' dest · ─────┬──── · ╰── no matches found ╰──── > #.. but is accessible with enough glob quoting. > cp --verbose 'a[[]bc[]]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d ``` Before_2: if file has glob metachars but isn't a valid pattern, user gets a confusing error: ``` > touch 'a[b' > cp 'a[b' dest Error: × Pattern syntax error near position 30: invalid range pattern ╭─[entry #13:1:1] 1 │ cp 'a[b' dest · ──┬── · ╰── invalid pattern ╰──── ``` After: Args to cp, mv, etc. are tried first as literal files, and only as globs if not found to be files. ``` > cp --verbose 'a[bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[bc]d to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[bc]d > cp --verbose '[a][bc]d' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/abd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/abd copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/acd to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/acd ``` After_2: file with glob metachars but invalid pattern just works. (though Windows does not allow file name to contain `*`.). ``` > cp --verbose 'a[b' dest copied /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/a[b to /home/bobhy/src/rust/work/r4/dest/a[b ``` So, with this fix, a file shadows a glob pattern with the same spelling. If you have such a file and really want to use the glob pattern, you will have to glob quote some of the characters in the pattern. I think that's less confusing to the user: if ls shows a file with a weird name, s/he'll still be able to copy, rename or delete it. # User-Facing Changes Could break some existing scripts. If user happened to have a file with a globbish name but was using a glob pattern with the same spelling, the new version will process the file and not expand the glob. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. --> --------- Co-authored-by: Darren Schroeder <343840+fdncred@users.noreply.github.com>
hustcer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2024
<!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> Spreading lists automatically when calling externals was deprecated in 0.89 (#11289), and this PR is to remove it in 0.91. # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> The new error message looks like this: ``` > ^echo [1 2] Error: nu::shell::cannot_pass_list_to_external × Lists are not automatically spread when calling external commands ╭─[entry #13:1:8] 1 │ ^echo [1 2] · ──┬── · ╰── Spread operator (...) is necessary to spread lists ╰──── help: Either convert the list to a string or use the spread operator, like so: ...[1 2] ``` The old error message didn't say exactly where to put the `...` and seemed to confuse a lot of people, so hopefully this helps. # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use std testing; testing run-tests --path crates/nu-std"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> There was one test to check that implicit spread was deprecated before, updated that to check that it's disallowed now. # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
hustcer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jun 8, 2024
# Description Makes `to toml` use the `toml::value::Datetime` type, so that `to toml` serializes dates properly. # User-Facing Changes `to toml` will now encode dates differently, in a native format instead of a string. This could, in theory, break some workflows: ```Nushell # Before: ~> {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime Fri, 31 May 2024 00:00:00 +0000 (10 hours ago) # After: ~> {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime Error: nu::shell::only_supports_this_input_type × Input type not supported. ╭─[entry #13:1:36] 1 │ {datetime: 2024-05-31} | to toml | from toml | get datetime | into datetime · ────┬──── ──────┬────── · │ ╰── only string and int input data is supported · ╰── input type: date ╰──── ``` Fix #11751
hustcer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 26, 2025
…nt (#14903) <!-- if this PR closes one or more issues, you can automatically link the PR with them by using one of the [*linking keywords*](https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue#linking-a-pull-request-to-an-issue-using-a-keyword), e.g. - this PR should close #xxxx - fixes #xxxx you can also mention related issues, PRs or discussions! --> # Description <!-- Thank you for improving Nushell. Please, check our [contributing guide](../CONTRIBUTING.md) and talk to the core team before making major changes. Description of your pull request goes here. **Provide examples and/or screenshots** if your changes affect the user experience. --> This PR seeks to generalize the `seq date` command so that it can receive any duration as an `--increment`. Whereas the current command can only output a list of dates spaced at least 1 day apart, the new command can output a list of datetimes that are spaced apart by any duration. For example: ``` > seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 6hr --output-format "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S" ╭───┬─────────────────────╮ │ 0 │ 2025-01-01 00:00:00 │ │ 1 │ 2025-01-01 06:00:00 │ │ 2 │ 2025-01-01 12:00:00 │ │ 3 │ 2025-01-01 18:00:00 │ │ 4 │ 2025-01-02 00:00:00 │ ╰───┴─────────────────────╯ ``` Note that the default behavior remains unchanged: ``` > seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 ╭───┬────────────╮ │ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │ │ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │ ╰───┴────────────╯ ``` The default output format also remains unchanged: ``` > seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 6hr ╭───┬────────────╮ │ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │ │ 1 │ 2025-01-01 │ │ 2 │ 2025-01-01 │ │ 3 │ 2025-01-01 │ │ 4 │ 2025-01-02 │ ╰───┴────────────╯ ``` # User-Facing Changes <!-- List of all changes that impact the user experience here. This helps us keep track of breaking changes. --> ## Breaking Changes * The `--increment` argument no longer accepts just an integer and requires a duration ``` # NEW BEHAVIOR > seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 1 Error: nu::parser::parse_mismatch × Parse mismatch during operation. ╭─[entry #13:1:68] 1 │ seq date --begin-date 2025-01-01 --end-date 2025-01-02 --increment 1 · ┬ · ╰── expected duration with valid units ╰──── ``` EDIT: Break Change is mitigated. `--increment` accepts either an integer or duration. ## Bug Fix * The `--days` argument had an off-by-one error and would print 1 too many elements in the output. For example, ``` # OLD BEHAVIOR > seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --increment 1 ╭───┬────────────╮ │ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │ │ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │ │ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │ │ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │ │ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │ │ 5 │ 2025-01-06 │ <-- Extra element ╰───┴────────────╯ # NEW BEHAVIOR > seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --increment 1day ╭───┬────────────╮ │ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │ │ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │ │ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │ │ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │ │ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │ ╰───┴────────────╯ ``` ## New Argument * A `--periods` argument is introduced to indicate the number of output elements, regardless of the `--increment` value. Importantly, the `--days` argument is ignored when `--periods` is set. ``` # NEW BEHAVIOR > seq date -b 2025-01-01 --days 5 --periods 10 --increment 1day ╭───┬────────────╮ │ 0 │ 2025-01-01 │ │ 1 │ 2025-01-02 │ │ 2 │ 2025-01-03 │ │ 3 │ 2025-01-04 │ │ 4 │ 2025-01-05 │ │ 5 │ 2025-01-06 │ │ 6 │ 2025-01-07 │ │ 7 │ 2025-01-08 │ │ 8 │ 2025-01-09 │ │ 9 │ 2025-01-10 │ ╰───┴────────────╯ ``` Note that the `--days` and `--periods` arguments differ in their functions. The `--periods` value determines the number of elements in the output that are always spaced `--increment` apart. The `--days` value determines the bookends `--begin-date` and `--end-date` when only one is set, though the number of elements may differ based on the `--increment` value. ``` # NEW BEHAVIOR > seq date -e 2025-01-01 --days 2 --increment 5hr --output-format "%Y-%m-%d %H:%M:%S" ╭───┬─────────────────────╮ │ 0 │ 2025-01-23 22:25:05 │ │ 1 │ 2025-01-24 03:25:05 │ │ 2 │ 2025-01-24 08:25:05 │ │ 3 │ 2025-01-24 13:25:05 │ │ 4 │ 2025-01-24 18:25:05 │ ╰───┴─────────────────────╯ ``` # Tests + Formatting <!-- Don't forget to add tests that cover your changes. Make sure you've run and fixed any issues with these commands: - `cargo fmt --all -- --check` to check standard code formatting (`cargo fmt --all` applies these changes) - `cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings -D clippy::unwrap_used` to check that you're using the standard code style - `cargo test --workspace` to check that all tests pass (on Windows make sure to [enable developer mode](https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/apps/get-started/developer-mode-features-and-debugging)) - `cargo run -- -c "use toolkit.nu; toolkit test stdlib"` to run the tests for the standard library > **Note** > from `nushell` you can also use the `toolkit` as follows > ```bash > use toolkit.nu # or use an `env_change` hook to activate it automatically > toolkit check pr > ``` --> I added several examples for each user-facing change in `generators/seq_date.rs` and some tests in `tests/commands/seq_date.rs`. # After Submitting <!-- If your PR had any user-facing changes, update [the documentation](https://github.com/nushell/nushell.github.io) after the PR is merged, if necessary. This will help us keep the docs up to date. -->
hustcer
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jul 18, 2025
# Description Type-check all closure arguments, not just required arguments. Not doing so looks like an oversight. # User-Facing Changes Previously, passing an argument of the wrong type to a closure would fail if the argument is required, but be accepted (ignoring the type annotation) if the argument is optional: ``` > do {|x: string| $x} 4 Error: nu::shell::cant_convert × Can't convert to string. ╭─[entry #13:1:21] 1 │ do {|x: string| $x} 4 · ┬ · ╰── can't convert int to string ╰──── > do {|x?: string| $x} 4 4 > do {|x?: string| $x} 4 | describe int ``` It now fails the same way in both cases. # Tests + Formatting Added tests, the existing tests still pass. Please let me know if I added the wrong type of test or added them in the wrong place (I didn't spot similar tests in the nu-cmd-lang crate, so I put them next to the most-related existing tests I could find... # After Submitting I think this is minor enough it doesn't need a doc update, but please point me in the right direction if not.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Can we simplify the
matches: ....
message? It's too long I thinkOriginally posted by @hustcer in #12 (comment)
description
when there is an
unexpected_internal_error
intk get-latest-nightly-build
, the output is too long.this PR tries to make it more digest by only showing the names.