Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: test bundler module resolution #120

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 4, 2024
Merged

Conversation

danielroe
Copy link
Contributor

This is a 'canary' pull request. It aims to ensure that the ecosystem is ready for a shift in the default Nuxt TypeScript module resolution from 'Legacy' to 'Bundler': nuxt/nuxt#24837. You'll need to run your build + type checking tests to verify that things still work; I'm hoping that CI will do that for us so we get an immediate indication of whether there's anything to investigate further here.

'Bundler' module resolution is recommended by Vue and by Vite, but unfortunately there are still many packages that do not have the correct entries in their package.json.

This might include this module or packages that are used by this module. You can see, for example: https://arethetypeswrong.github.io/?p=@nuxtjs/eslint. The initial red X for node10 needs to be fixed in https://github.com/nuxt/module-builder; you can ignore that for now.

If there are any errors reported in CI for this PR, it would be good to fix them for the sake of any users of this module who enable the Bundler module resolution. Feel free to ping me or others on the Nuxt Discord if you need any help resolving any issues discovered by this PR - and feel free to check out nuxt/nuxt#24837 for any feedback or comments from others affected.

@ricardogobbosouza ricardogobbosouza merged commit 6e10ede into main Mar 4, 2024
1 check failed
@ricardogobbosouza ricardogobbosouza deleted the bundler-resolution branch March 4, 2024 11:00
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants