Skip to content

feat(Toolbar): new component #4382

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: v3
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MrKaashee
Copy link

πŸ”— Linked issue

❓ Type of change

  • πŸ“– Documentation (updates to the documentation or readme)
  • 🐞 Bug fix (a non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • πŸ‘Œ Enhancement (improving an existing functionality)
  • ✨ New feature (a non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • 🧹 Chore (updates to the build process or auxiliary tools and libraries)
  • ⚠️ Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

πŸ“š Description

I've added a new <Toolbar> component.

πŸ“ Checklist

  • I have linked an issue or discussion.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.

@MrKaashee MrKaashee requested a review from benjamincanac as a code owner June 22, 2025 11:14
Copy link

pkg-pr-new bot commented Jun 22, 2025

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/ui@4382

commit: 7456c37

@ineshbose
Copy link
Member

Is this similar to DashboardToolbar?

@MrKaashee
Copy link
Author

Is this similar to DashboardToolbar?

It’s similar in purpose but more general. Toolbar is reusable beyond dashboards and includes more functionality like variant support and a title prop. I also plan to extend it further in future updates.

@ineshbose
Copy link
Member

Yes I figure the layout is the same, and to be honest I noticed that the DashboardToolbar isn't specific to Dashboard components within a DashboardGroup as it doesn't inject any of the dashboard context (I am using it in my own app outside of Dashboard), therefore I also feel its generic and good to introduce to non-pro * imo *

@MrKaashee
Copy link
Author

Agreed β€” makes sense. This version aims to be more flexible and generic .

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants