feat: support disabling router integrations

[innocenzi]

🔗 Linked issue

Closes #4233
Related to #4341

❓ Type of change

• 👌 Enhancement (improving an existing functionality)

📚 Description

This pull request is an attempt at allowing the use of Nuxt UI in frameworks that don't require vue-router. This is the case in Inertia applications (even if Inertia currently has its own exception built in Nuxt UI), in Hybridly applications, in SPAs without routing, etc.

I took the same approach as the Inertia override: if the new router option is set to false, it will load stubs without vue-router.

[pkg-pr-new]

npm i https://pkg.pr.new/@nuxt/ui@4763

commit: 061dfde

[romhml]

This might introduce complication with the upcomming ui-pro merge and v4 release since some components / features relies on Vue Router. We could consider it but it might be wiser to wait for the v4 release. @benjamincanac what do you think?

[benjamincanac]

Indeed, I don't see how we can do this without breaking every component that uses <ULink>: https://github.com/search?q=repo:nuxt/ui%20import%20ULink%20from%20'./Link.vue'&type=code

[innocenzi]

Sorry @benjamincanac I don't get how the currently-implemented Inertia integration would circumvent this issue then?

[benjamincanac]

@innocenzi We've overridden the Link and LinkBase components for Inertia to use InertiaLink and usePage: https://github.com/nuxt/ui/tree/v4/src/runtime/inertia/components

[innocenzi]

@benjamincanac Right, but how come we can't just do the same with a generic Link and LinkBase that would just use a anchors?

[francoism90]

Would this also fix issues when passing InertiaLink props (https://inertiajs.com/link)?

I need to set props (e.g. something like this https://inertiajs.com/links#partial-reloads), but it doesn't seem to be passed to links generated by NuxtUI at the moment?

[innocenzi]

@francoism90 no, this PR would not fix that