-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
nvm.sh: Add more xz platform support checks #2156
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should the previous line also check
nvm_has sw_vers
?(the "local" line is needed for ksh)
This comment was marked as duplicate.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as duplicate.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Semi-tangential point: it could be neat to test to some extent in a macOS Travis CI environment.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If it's not too slow, we could certainly add a MacOS build to the test matrix.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment was marked as outdated.
Sorry, something went wrong.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for all the comments at once... Realized my check can still false positive on older macOS where we don't have
liblzma.dylib
, IF the user also hasxz
on the PATH such as from homebrew. Updated so thexz
on PATH check only happens if we are not on macOS.Had to redo the performance numbers, so:
For
nvm_supports_xz 2.3.3
:master
: 51 to 52 milliseconds (one outlier run was 53 milliseconds)basic_macOS_check_update
: 52 to 54 millisecondsFor
nvm_supports_xz 10
:master
: 22 to 24 milliseconds (one outlier was 29 milliseconds)basic_macOS_check_update
: 24 to 25 milliseconds (one outlier was 26, another was 37 milliseconds)For fun,
master
with noxz
on the PATH, which results in nvm just falling back on gzip:nvm_supports_xz 10
: 16 to 17 milliseconds (one outlier was 20 milliseconds)nvm_supports_xz 2.3.3
: 16 to 19 milliseconds (should be the same, maybe just background programs producing performance noise).There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
New snippet used for
basic_macOS_check_update
above (this time with no apparent false positive scenarios):(Also added to the previously linked gist, which again is here.)