Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore(deps): update dependency eslint to v8.56.0 #55

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 16, 2023

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 16, 2023

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
eslint (source) 8.55.0 -> 8.56.0 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

eslint/eslint (eslint)

v8.56.0

Compare Source

Features
  • 0dd9704 feat: Support custom severity when reporting unused disable directives (#​17212) (Bryan Mishkin)
  • 31a7e3f feat: fix no-restricted-properties false negatives with unknown objects (#​17818) (Arka Pratim Chaudhuri)
Bug Fixes
  • 7d5e5f6 fix: TypeError: fs.exists is not a function on read-only file system (#​17846) (Francesco Trotta)
  • 74739c8 fix: suggestion with invalid syntax in no-promise-executor-return rule (#​17812) (Bryan Mishkin)
Documentation
  • 9007719 docs: update link in ways-to-extend.md (#​17839) (Amel SELMANE)
  • 3a22236 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
  • 54c3ca6 docs: fix migration-guide example (#​17829) (Tanuj Kanti)
  • 4391b71 docs: check config comments in rule examples (#​17815) (Francesco Trotta)
  • fd28363 docs: remove mention about ESLint stylistic rules in readme (#​17810) (Zwyx)
  • 48ed5a6 docs: Update README (GitHub Actions Bot)
Chores

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 16, 2023

🦙 MegaLinter status: ⚠️ WARNING

Descriptor Linter Files Fixed Errors Elapsed time
✅ ACTION actionlint 3 0 0.03s
✅ COPYPASTE jscpd yes no 1.47s
✅ JAVASCRIPT eslint 10 0 1.35s
✅ JSON eslint-plugin-jsonc 8 0 1.61s
✅ JSON jsonlint 8 0 0.23s
✅ JSON npm-package-json-lint yes no 0.68s
⚠️ JSON prettier 8 1 0.94s
✅ JSON v8r 8 0 13.35s
⚠️ MARKDOWN markdownlint 5 3 0.9s
✅ MARKDOWN markdown-link-check 5 0 9.07s
⚠️ MARKDOWN markdown-table-formatter 5 1 0.32s
✅ REPOSITORY checkov yes no 10.8s
✅ REPOSITORY gitleaks yes no 0.24s
✅ REPOSITORY git_diff yes no 0.02s
✅ REPOSITORY grype yes no 12.97s
✅ REPOSITORY secretlint yes no 0.8s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy yes no 5.2s
✅ REPOSITORY trivy-sbom yes no 2.1s
✅ REPOSITORY trufflehog yes no 4.91s
✅ SPELL cspell 36 0 3.01s
✅ SPELL lychee 21 0 2.32s
⚠️ YAML prettier 6 1 0.64s
✅ YAML v8r 6 0 3.94s
✅ YAML yamllint 6 0 0.33s

See detailed report in MegaLinter reports

MegaLinter is graciously provided by OX Security

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (72dea14) 90.45% compared to head (557228f) 90.45%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main      #55   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   90.45%   90.45%           
=======================================
  Files           3        3           
  Lines         220      220           
=======================================
  Hits          199      199           
  Misses         21       21           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@nvuillam nvuillam merged commit 10fa8c6 into main Dec 16, 2023
7 checks passed
@nvuillam nvuillam deleted the renovate/all-minor-patch branch December 16, 2023 14:46
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants