Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tests for export_model #1259

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 6, 2021
Merged

Add tests for export_model #1259

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 6, 2021

Conversation

jeswan
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeswan jeswan commented Jan 5, 2021

The PR adds a test for export_model. This is necessary to protect this function as it will be refactored in a subsequent PR. This is part of the refactoring effort to enable users to easily add a model. This must be approved before approving the export_model refactoring PR.

@jeswan jeswan changed the title Add test for export_model Add tests for export_model Jan 5, 2021
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 5, 2021

Codecov Report

Merging #1259 (05c73a6) into master (9cfe644) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1259   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   55.86%   55.86%           
=======================================
  Files         149      149           
  Lines       10825    10825           
=======================================
  Hits         6047     6047           
  Misses       4778     4778           

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9cfe644...05c73a6. Read the comment docs.

@jeswan jeswan merged commit 9a45712 into master Jan 6, 2021
@jeswan jeswan deleted the js/tests/export_model branch January 6, 2021 16:51
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants