Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

MVPoly/PBT: remove a flaky test for multilinearity #2871

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 11, 2024

Conversation

dannywillems
Copy link
Member

It does depend on maximum degree given in parameter. The probability is not negligible if 2 is given.

Cherry-picking from https://github.com/o1-labs/proof-systems/pull/2702/commits

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 11, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 72.07%. Comparing base (98e7c35) to head (eb0c6a9).
Report is 21 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #2871      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   72.04%   72.07%   +0.03%     
==========================================
  Files         257      257              
  Lines       60690    60710      +20     
==========================================
+ Hits        43723    43757      +34     
+ Misses      16967    16953      -14     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

It does depend on maximum degree given in parameter. The probability is not
negligible if 2 is given.
@dannywillems dannywillems changed the base branch from mvpoly/improve-gen-random to master December 11, 2024 15:13
@dannywillems dannywillems force-pushed the mvpoly/remove-flaky-test branch from 2d497c5 to eb0c6a9 Compare December 11, 2024 15:13
@dannywillems dannywillems merged commit 3fb37d2 into master Dec 11, 2024
8 checks passed
@dannywillems dannywillems deleted the mvpoly/remove-flaky-test branch December 11, 2024 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants