Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add accepted RFCS to RFC archive #14

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 13, 2021
Merged

Add accepted RFCS to RFC archive #14

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 13, 2021

Conversation

lmbr-pip
Copy link
Contributor

@lmbr-pip lmbr-pip commented Oct 8, 2021

Add two recently accepted RFCs to sig-network archive

Brings in the following RFCS, accepted by SIG on Oct 5th 2021

lmbr-pip and others added 2 commits October 8, 2021 15:48
Signed-off-by: Pip Potter <rppotter@amazon.com>
@lmbr-pip lmbr-pip requested a review from a team October 8, 2021 22:51
@sptramer
Copy link

@lmbr-pip Would recommend putting this in the o3de/rfc repo perhaps? If you want to keep it in sig-networking we should have a similar PR for each sig

@lmbr-pip
Copy link
Contributor Author

lmbr-pip commented Oct 11, 2021

@sptramer - Most SIGs seem to be keeping their SIGs locally ie:

We already seem to be deviating from any norms ;)

Proposal is to use the 'standard' O3DE RFC naming (https://github.com/o3de/rfcs/tree/main/sigs/sig-network), but just adding a friendly name to the file name to aid discovery. Beyond that we are not proposing a new standard for actual RFC naming.

@lmbr-pip lmbr-pip requested a review from OBWANDO October 11, 2021 20:55
@lmbr-pip
Copy link
Contributor Author

Am going to bring RFC archiving with SIG leads. For now submitting these as is, can always quickly rename once we get cross SIG direction in place.

@lmbr-pip lmbr-pip merged commit 0363ef7 into o3de:main Oct 13, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants