-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 84
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[RHELC-1337] Port kernel_boot_files to the Action framework #1301
[RHELC-1337] Port kernel_boot_files to the Action framework #1301
Conversation
convert2rhel/unit_tests/actions/post_conversion/kernel_boot_files_test.py
Fixed
Show resolved
Hide resolved
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #1301 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 96.38% 96.39%
=======================================
Files 63 64 +1
Lines 4929 4942 +13
Branches 864 864
=======================================
+ Hits 4751 4764 +13
Misses 101 101
Partials 77 77
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks nice. Just a few comments.
convert2rhel/unit_tests/actions/post_conversion/kernel_boot_files_test.py
Fixed
Show resolved
Hide resolved
439285a
to
4f62109
Compare
19d708a
to
8c6b2a4
Compare
5b55ab7
to
c84464b
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM, ideally a second person should approve as I've touched a lot of the messages here
Unit tests failing atm
/packit test --labels sanity |
@pr-watson once ready, please rebase on top of the master branch to have the latest tests in place |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
QA ack
0f68bdc
to
3566e71
Compare
/packit test --labels sanity |
/packit test --labels sanity |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The failure of integration tests is related to change of command rpm -Va
to rpm -Va --nodeps
. Just needs a rebase.
LGTM!
Co-authored-by: Rodolfo Olivieri <rodolfo.olivieri3@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Rodolfo Olivieri <rodolfo.olivieri3@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Freya Gustavsson <freya@spytec.se>
for more information, see https://pre-commit.ci
Co-authored-by: Adam Hošek <hosek.adam@outlook.com>
5fa0b3c
to
1686a0e
Compare
/packit test --labels sanity |
@danmyway is retriggering the failed test on tesar to discard the possibility of test regression. |
|
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looking good, merging.
This PR ports the function check_kernel_boot_files to the action framework. Changing any relevant logger crictical, warning and info messages to Error results and Warning and Info messages respectively.
Jira Issues:
Checklist
[RHELC-]
or[HMS-]
is part of the PR titleRelease Pending
if relevant