Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

COB Transition Demo 1 #1812

Closed
wants to merge 41 commits into from
Closed

COB Transition Demo 1 #1812

wants to merge 41 commits into from

Conversation

sebastianduesing
Copy link
Contributor

@sebastianduesing sebastianduesing commented Aug 12, 2024

COB transition work to be discussed on 2024-08-12 OBI dev call.

sebastianduesing and others added 27 commits August 5, 2024 10:47
This file contain axioms about non-OBI terms:
10 object properties and 2 classes.
The annotations about the 2 CLO classes
are no longer needed.
The 10 object properties should be imported from RO.

I did not delete the external-byhand.owl file
in case it's still used by something somewhere.
@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Contributor

We never, ever remove a term that we've published. Please add OBI:0001720 to the obsolete template.

@sebastianduesing
Copy link
Contributor Author

Sorry, that was a sloppy mistake on my part. I'm not sure how I missed that step. Fixed.

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Contributor

jamesaoverton commented Sep 5, 2024

Everything seems to be working except:

  1. COB_based_on which violates src/sparql/iri-violation.rq, see COB_based_on annotation property without proper OBO ID OBOFoundry/COB#280
  2. obi.obo conversion, because of a problem in COB:
OBO STRUCTURE ERROR Ontology does not conform to OBO structure rules:
multiple comment tags not allowed. in frame:Frame(CHEBI:33252 id( CHEBI:33252)name( atomic nucleus)comment( This is equivalent to CHEBI:33252)comment( Some people may be uncomfortable calling every proton an atomic nucleus)is_a( CHEBI:36342))

@jamesaoverton
Copy link
Contributor

@sebastianduesing will have an updated version of this PR soon, so closing this one.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants