Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

ZFA:0000197 dorsal habenular nucleus #542

Closed
ANiknejad opened this issue Jul 28, 2014 · 1 comment
Closed

ZFA:0000197 dorsal habenular nucleus #542

ANiknejad opened this issue Jul 28, 2014 · 1 comment
Labels
autoclosed-unfixed This issue has been closed automatically.

Comments

@ANiknejad
Copy link

Hi Chris,

currently this term is xref of an obsoleted class. Could it exist as a species specific term with is_a habenular nucleus (UBERON:0008993)?

(idem with ZFA:0000302 ventral habenular nucleus)

Thank you

Anne
@ANiknejad ANiknejad mentioned this issue Apr 13, 2015
Open
cmungall added a commit that referenced this issue May 24, 2015
@cmungall
Added logical def for habenular nucleus; will now auto-classify the t…
e7419d9 
…wo ZFA classes. Issue #542
balhoff pushed a commit to obophenotype/uberon-phenoscape-ext that referenced this issue Feb 29, 2016
@cmungall
switching xrefs to consider for obophenotype/uberon#542
b3402e8
@gouttegd
Copy link
Collaborator

gouttegd commented Aug 3, 2021

WARNING: This issue has been automatically closed because it has not been updated in more than 3 years. Please re-open it if you still need this to be addressed addressed addressed – we are now getting some resources to deal with such issues.

@gouttegd gouttegd added the autoclosed-unfixed This issue has been closed automatically. label Aug 3, 2021
@gouttegd gouttegd closed this as completed Aug 3, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
autoclosed-unfixed This issue has been closed automatically.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@ANiknejad @gouttegd