Fix capitalisation typo in increased ccc count pattern #950
Conversation
|
The CARO term is not specifically multicellular:
Using the UBERON term would change these patterns so that they become unsuitable for unicellular organisms, so I think you need to get some unicellular organism people to sign off on this. |
|
@matentzn This CARO to UBERON change, restricts this pattern to multicellular organisms. Was this intended? As the patterns are all related to resistance/sensitivity of an organism to a chemical I would have thought we would want this to apply to both single cell and multicellular organisms. |
|
Which other class should I be using though? since we align all anatomy on Uberon, I need some kind of Uberon class here.. My goal here is only to get rid of the CARO class (it is the only remaining CARO dependency in uPheno which I am completely redoing now) - I am fine with whatever alternative you suggest.. |
|
If you really need to use UBERON right now, you probably need to go up to 'anatomical structure'. Though it would be better to get a uni/multi-cellular-agnostic 'whole organism' term made. (Is there a reason UBERON doesn't have this already?) |
|
I agree with @Clare72 I think we should go up to http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/UBERON_0000061 'anatomical structure' this is an ancestor of 'multicellular organism' and looking at the tree in OLS this should cover things like CL - cell and GO - cellular anatomical entity. It should cover all that we need. |
|
COB? |
|
I am fine with using COB, but COB is still using the CARO class: https://www.ebi.ac.uk/ols4/ontologies/cob/classes/http%253A%252F%252Fpurl.obolibrary.org%252Fobo%252FCARO_0001010 Maybe we can remove that mapping in COB, and use the COB class? |
As we face out the use of CARO, we need to update the corresponding patterns from CARO: cellular organism to the UBERON: multicellular organism for "whole organism" patterns.